Literature DB >> 1844380

[Immediate hypersensitivity reactions after intravenous use of antivenin sera: prognostic value of intradermal sensitivity tests].

P Cupo1, M M Azevedo-Marques, J B de Menezes, S E Hering.   

Abstract

The frequency and class of immediate-type hypersensitivity manifestations were studied in 494 snakebitten and scorpion stung patients who were treated with intravenous injections of antivenom sera. These patients were admitted to HC-FMRPUSP from 1983 to 1988. The effectiveness of a hypersensitivity skin test was also investigated. Eighty two out of 320 patients admitted following snake bites (25.6%) had immediate-type reactions consisting of isolated skin lesions (40%), skin lesions plus respiratory manifestations (19%) and gastrointestinal involvement (17%). Anaphylactic shock occurred in ten patients (12%). Thirteen out of 174 patients admitted following scorpion stings had immediate-type reactions (7.5%). There was also a preponderance of skin reactions. Anaphylactic shock was observed in one patient. The positive predictive value of hypersensitivity skin test was 31.8% and its sensibility was 54.8%. These data show that a hypersensitivity skin test is ineffective in predicting immediate-type hypersensitivity manifestations in patients given snake and scorpion antivenom. Considering these results, this test should be eliminated as a routine procedure when treating victims of poisonous animals. These studies indicate that prior to the administration of antivenom anti-histamine (H1- and H2-antagonists) as well corticosteroids should be given by i.v. route in order to prevent or reduce hypersensitivity reactions. Antivenom sera must always be given under continuous medical surveillance by an intravenous route, without dilution, drop by drop for 15-30 minutes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1844380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo        ISSN: 0036-4665            Impact factor:   1.846


  5 in total

1.  Adverse drug reaction profile of anti-snake venom in a rural tertiary care teaching hospital.

Authors:  Rushikesh Prabhakar Deshpande; Vijay Motiram Motghare; Sudhir Laxman Padwal; Rakesh Ramkrishna Pore; Chetanraj Ghanshyam Bhamare; Vinod Shivaji Deshmukh; Harshal Nutan Pise
Journal:  J Young Pharm       Date:  2013-04-02

2.  Workgroup Report by the Joint Task Force Involving American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); Food Allergy, Anaphylaxis, Dermatology and Drug Allergy (FADDA) (Adverse Reactions to Foods Committee and Adverse Reactions to Drugs, Biologicals, and Latex Committee); and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Botulism Clinical Treatment Guidelines Workgroup-Allergic Reactions to Botulinum Antitoxin: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Edith Schussler; Jeremy Sobel; Joy Hsu; Patricia Yu; Dana Meaney-Delman; Leslie C Grammer; Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Sequential randomised and double blind trial of promethazine prophylaxis against early anaphylactic reactions to antivenom for bothrops snake bites.

Authors:  H W Fan; L F Marcopito; J L Cardoso; F O França; C M Malaque; R A Ferrari; R D Theakston; D A Warrell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-29

4.  Hypersensitivity reaction to scorpion antivenom.

Authors:  Hossein Sanaei-Zadeh
Journal:  Indian Dermatol Online J       Date:  2014-11

Review 5.  A Contemporary Exploration of Traditional Indian Snake Envenomation Therapies.

Authors:  Adwait M Deshpande; K Venkata Sastry; Satish B Bhise
Journal:  Trop Med Infect Dis       Date:  2022-06-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.