Literature DB >> 18443745

The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of non-traumatic acute abdominal pain.

Mehmet Selim Nural1, Meltem Ceyhan, Ahmet Baydin, Selim Genc, Ilkay Koray Bayrak, Muzaffer Elmali.   

Abstract

Our aim was to assess the effects of initial ultrasonography (US) evaluation on the diagnosis and management of non-traumatic acute abdominal pain in the emergency department. Three hundred patients with the complaint of non-traumatic acute abdominal pain who were sent for US examination with an initial clinical impression were included in the study. Pre-US and post-US surveys were designed for the clinicians who requested US. The percentage concordance of US findings with the discharge diagnosis made by clinical follow-up, imaging modalities and surgery was determined by calculating the confidence interval. The concordance of the initial clinical impression and the US diagnosis with the discharge diagnosis were compared using the McNemar test. US could not detect any pathology in 102 (34%; 95%CI, 28.6-39.3%) of the patients. The US revealed a different diagnosis than the clinical impression in 69 (23%; 95%CI, 18.2-27.7%), and confirmed the diagnosis in 121 (40%; 95%CI, 34.4-45.5%) patients. The US changed the treatment plans in 47% (95%CI, 41.3-52.6%) of the patients. The clinicians stated US helped them "very much" or "moderately" in making a diagnosis in 83% (95%CI, 78.7-87.2%). When US results were compared with the discharge diagnosis, there was concordance in 238 (79.3%; 95%CI, 74.3-83.6%) patients but not in 62 (20.6%; 95%CI, 16-25.1%). Among 121 patients the initial clinical impression agreed with the US diagnosis and there was concordance with the discharge diagnosis in 105 (86.7%; 95%CI, 80-92.7%). The concordance of US findings with the discharge diagnosis was significantly higher than that of the initial clinical impression statistically. In the initial evaluation of the patients with acute abdominal pain, US is considerably helpful in making the correct diagnosis, and that the concordance with the discharge diagnosis is high. When whole abdominal scanning is not performed, targeted US study according to the initial clinical impression decreases the clinical benefit of US.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18443745     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-008-0157-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  14 in total

1.  The therapeutic impact of abdominal ultrasound in patients with acute abdominal symptoms.

Authors:  S Dhillon; S Halligan; V Goh; P Matravers; A Chambers; D Remedios
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Ultrasonography in patients without trauma in the emergency department: impact on discharge diagnosis.

Authors:  Yoel Siegel; Ahuva Grubstein; Vladislav Postnikov; Osnat Moreh; Ethan Yussim; Maya Cohen
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Assessment of acute abdominal pain: utility of a second cross-sectional imaging examination.

Authors:  Angela M Riddell; Korosh Khalili
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Sonography and the acute abdomen: practical considerations.

Authors:  J B Puylaert; F M van der Zant; A M Rijke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Management of the periappendiceal inflammatory mass.

Authors:  R B Jeffrey
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 1.875

6.  Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  M P Rosen; D Z Sands; H E Longmaid; K F Reynolds; M Wagner; V Raptopoulos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Quantifying the usefulness of CT in evaluating seniors with abdominal pain.

Authors:  Lawrence M Lewis; Allen P Klippel; Rebecca A Bavolek; Laura M Ross; Tara M Scherer; Gerald A Banet
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Value of abdominal CT in the emergency department for patients with abdominal pain.

Authors:  Max P Rosen; Bettina Siewert; Daniel Z Sands; Rebecca Bromberg; Jonathan Edlow; Vassilios Raptopoulos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Abdominal pain in the ED: stability and change over 20 years.

Authors:  R D Powers; A T Guertler
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.469

10.  Use of diagnostic testing in the emergency department for patients presenting with non-traumatic abdominal pain.

Authors:  J Tobias Nagurney; David F M Brown; Yuchiao Chang; Swati Sane; Andrew C Wang; Justin B Weiner
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.484

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Secondary peritonitis: principles of diagnosis and intervention.

Authors:  James T Ross; Michael A Matthay; Hobart W Harris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-06-18

2.  US in the evaluation of abdominal pain in a department of internal medicine.

Authors:  F Simoni; N Vitturi; M Tagliente; M Soattin; G Realdi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2011-09-01

Review 3.  The role of emergency ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute non-traumatic epigastric pain.

Authors:  Americo Testa; Ernesto Cristiano Lauritano; Rosangela Giannuzzi; Giulia Pignataro; Ivo Casagranda; Nicolò Gentiloni Silveri
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Factors predicting significant pathology on ultrasonography in women presenting with non-specific lower abdominal pain.

Authors:  D K Bilku; T C Hall; A R Dennison; M S Metcalfe; G Garcea
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Retrospective cohort study on clinical predictors for acute abnormalities on CT scan in adult patients with abdominal pain.

Authors:  Hady Zgheib; Cynthia Wakil; Sami Shayya; Mohamad Kanso; Ralph Bou Chebl; Rana Bachir; Mazen El Sayed
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2020-01-27

6.  Impact of clinical experience and diagnostic performance in patients with acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  Helena Laurell; Lars-Erik Hansson; Ulf Gunnarsson
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.260

7.  Spectrum of diseases and diagnostic values of ultrasound in adult patients with nontraumatic acute abdomen in a nigerian tertiary health facility.

Authors:  Bimbo Ayoola Ashaolu; Mopelola Christianah Asaleye; Adebayo Victor Adetiloye; Isaac Olusegun Alatise
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

8.  The role of US examination in the management of acute abdomen.

Authors:  Maria Antonietta Mazzei; Susanna Guerrini; Nevada Cioffi Squitieri; Lucio Cagini; Luca Macarini; Francesco Coppolino; Melchiore Giganti; Luca Volterrani
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2013-07-15

9.  Abnormal Ultrasonographic Findings among Referred Patients with Pain Abdomen in the Radiology Department of a Tertiary Care Center: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Smriti Mulmi; Marina Vaidya Shrestha; Sanjeev Pradhan
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 0.556

10.  A Curious Case of Right Upper Quadrant Abdominal Pain.

Authors:  Andrew Grock; Wendy Chan; Ian S deSouza
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-08-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.