Literature DB >> 18442964

Decision-making, emotional distress, and quality of life in patients affected by the recall of their implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Douglas P Gibson1, Kristin K Kuntz, James L Levenson, Kenneth A Ellenbogen.   

Abstract

AIMS: We sought to investigate whether patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) were suffering from emotional distress related to the recent United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recalls, to better understand their decision process related to device replacement, and to assess any impact of recall on quality of life (QOL). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Thirty-one patients experiencing device recalls answered questions regarding their knowledge about the recall and their decision whether to replace the device. Fifty patients whose devices were not recalled reported demographic data. In both groups, psychological factors were assessed. No significant differences were found for psychological factors. Most patients reported being informed of their recall by their physician. Most estimated the risk of device failure to be low or very low, but they overestimated the fail rate. Thirty-six per cent of patients reported feeling anxious about the recall.
CONCLUSION: No significant differences existed in psychological factors and QOL between patients whose ICDs were recalled compared with those whose devices were not. The majority of patients whose ICDs are the subject of an FDA advisory/recall have a realistic understanding of the risks of device failure. Prompt information, support, and reassurance provided by healthcare professionals may allay patient distress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18442964     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eun082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  4 in total

1.  The effect of device advisories on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.

Authors:  Mitesh S Amin; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Effective communication and ethical consent in decisions related to ICDs.

Authors:  Alexander M Clark; Tiny Jaarsma; Patricia Strachan; Patricia M Davidson; Megan Jerke; James M Beattie; Amanda S Duncan; Chantal F Ski; David R Thompson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Perspectives of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices who received advisory warnings.

Authors:  Abigale L Ottenberg; Luke A Mueller; Paul S Mueller
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.210

Review 4.  Making decisions about implantable cardioverter-defibrillators from implantation to end of life: an integrative review of patients' perspectives.

Authors:  Krystina B Lewis; Dawn Stacey; Dan D Matlock
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.