Literature DB >> 18442804

Blunt abdominal trauma: back to clinical judgement in the era of modern technology.

Raafat Y Afifi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Abdominal trauma poses a diagnostic challenge to most trauma surgeons. This study evaluates a clinical scoring system in 476 blunt abdominal trauma patients treated by the author over a period of 92 months. Patients were sorted into three groups according to the score results. Priority I group (160 patients) was subjected to an immediate laparotomy. Priority II group (200 patients) was treated according to the results of auxiliary investigations. Priority III group (116 patients) was kept under observation. The treatment outcome was used as a gold standard for the evaluation of the results.
RESULTS: In priority I and III groups (276 cases) the management was only dependent on the proposed clinical score with a 100% specificity, 88% sensitivity, 90% positive predictive value, 100% negative predictive value and an overall accuracy of 94%.
CONCLUSIONS: This scoring system (CASS) is helpful in ensuring rapid diagnosis and treatment, reduces time, costs and mortality that may result from improper and/or delayed diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 18442804     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  1 in total

1.  Non-operative management of blunt hepatic and splenic injuries-practical aspects and value of radiological scoring systems.

Authors:  Margot Fodor; Florian Primavesi; Dagmar Morell-Hofert; Matthias Haselbacher; Eva Braunwarth; Benno Cardini; Eva Gassner; Dietmar Öfner; Stefan Stättner
Journal:  Eur Surg       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 0.953

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.