Literature DB >> 18442643

Microporous membrane growth substrates for embryonic stem cell culture and differentiation.

Steven D Sheridan1, Sonia Gil, Matthew Wilgo, Aldo Pitt.   

Abstract

As the field of embryonic stem cell culture and differentiation advances, many diverse culturing techniques will ultimately be necessary in order to fully reproduce the various environments these cells normally encounter during development. Although most of the work to date has been performed on solid plastic supports, this growth support has several limitations in its representation of the in vivo environment. Impermeable substrates force the cells to exchange their gas and nutrients exclusively through the top side of the cultured cells. In contrast, cells growing in vivo are exposed from several directions to factors from the blood, other cells, soluble factors, and liquid-air interfaces. Additionally, solid plastic presents a smooth two-dimensional surface that is not experienced in vivo. Therefore, the use of traditional plastic presents limitations upon normal cellular morphology, function, and differentiation. An important alternative to growth on solid plastic is the growth of cells on microporous membranes. One of the many advantages to cell growth on porous membrane substrates is their ability to provide a surface that better mimics a three-dimensional in vivo setting. A porous membrane allows multidirectional exposure to nutrients and waste products. In addition, the membrane separation of dual chambers allows for the coculture of cells of different origin to study how cells interact through indirect signaling or through providing a conditioned niche for the proper growth and differentiation of cell types.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18442643     DOI: 10.1016/S0091-679X(08)00003-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Cell Biol        ISSN: 0091-679X            Impact factor:   1.441


  7 in total

1.  Subendothelial matrix components influence endothelial cell apoptosis in vitro.

Authors:  Michael Saemisch; Mercedes Balcells; Lisa Riesinger; Markus Nickmann; Shirin Issa Bhaloo; Elazer R Edelman; Heiko Methe
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.249

2.  Microfabrication of High-Resolution Porous Membranes for Cell Culture.

Authors:  Monica Y Kim; David Jiang Li; Long K Pham; Brandon G Wong; Elliot E Hui
Journal:  J Memb Sci       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 8.742

3.  Propagation of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells in an indirect co-culture system.

Authors:  Sheena Abraham; Steven D Sheridan; Louise C Laurent; Kelsey Albert; Christopher Stubban; Igor Ulitsky; Bradley Miller; Jeanne F Loring; Raj R Rao
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Epigenetic characterization of the FMR1 gene and aberrant neurodevelopment in human induced pluripotent stem cell models of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Steven D Sheridan; Kraig M Theriault; Surya A Reis; Fen Zhou; Jon M Madison; Laurence Daheron; Jeanne F Loring; Stephen J Haggarty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Analysis of embryoid bodies derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells as a means to assess pluripotency.

Authors:  Steven D Sheridan; Vasudha Surampudi; Raj R Rao
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.443

6.  Novel membrane-based electrochemical sensor for real-time bio-applications.

Authors:  Fatima AlZahra'a Alatraktchi; Tanya Bakmand; Maria Dimaki; Winnie E Svendsen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Rapid Fabrication of Membrane-Integrated Thermoplastic Elastomer Microfluidic Devices.

Authors:  Alexander H McMillan; Emma K Thomée; Alessandra Dellaquila; Hussam Nassman; Tatiana Segura; Sasha Cai Lesher-Pérez
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.891

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.