Literature DB >> 18441756

The internal pressure and stress environment of the scoliotic intervertebral disc--a review.

A Meir1, D S McNally, J C Fairbank, D Jones, J P Urban.   

Abstract

The aetiology, in terms of both initiation and progression, of the deformity in idiopathic scoliosis is at present unclear. Even in neuromuscular cases, the mechanisms underlying progression are not fully elucidated. It is thought, however, that asymmetrical loading is involved in the progression of the disease, with evidence mainly from animal studies and modelling. There is, however, very little direct information as to the origin or mechanism of action of these forces in the scoliotic spine. This review describes the concept of intervertebral disc pressure or stress and examines possible measurement techniques. The biological and mechanical consequences of abnormalities in these parameters are described. Future possible studies and their clinical significance are also briefly discussed. Techniques of pressure measurement have culminated in the development of 'pressure profilometry', which provides stress profiles across the disc in mutually perpendicular axes. A hydrated intervertebral disc exhibits mainly hydrostatic behaviour. However, in pathological states such as degeneration and scoliosis, non-hydrostatic behaviour predominates and annular peaks of stress occur. Recent studies have shown that, in scoliosis, high hydrostatic pressures are seen with asymmetrical stresses from concave to convex sides. These abnormalities could influence both disc and endplate cellular activity directly, causing asymmetrical growth and matrix changes. In addition, disc cells could be influenced via nutritional changes consequent to end-plate calcification. Evidence suggests that the stress environment of the scoliotic disc is abnormal, probably generated by high and asymmetrical loading of non-muscular origin. If present in the scoliotic spine during daily activities, this could generate a positive feedback of cellular changes, resulting in curve progression. Future advances in understanding may rely on the development of computer models owing to the difficulties of in-vivo invasive measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18441756     DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  8 in total

1.  Characterization of the annulus fibrosus-vertebral body interface: identification of new structural features.

Authors:  Y S Nosikova; J P Santerre; M Grynpas; G Gibson; R A Kandel
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Mechanisms and clinical implications of intervertebral disc calcification.

Authors:  Uruj Zehra; Marianna Tryfonidou; James C Iatridis; Svenja Illien-Jünger; Fackson Mwale; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 32.286

3.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), environment, exposome and epigenetics: a molecular perspective of postnatal normal spinal growth and the etiopathogenesis of AIS with consideration of a network approach and possible implications for medical therapy.

Authors:  R Geoffrey Burwell; Peter H Dangerfield; Alan Moulton; Theodoros B Grivas
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2011-12-02

4.  Plasticity of vertebral wedge deformities in skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after posterior corrective surgery.

Authors:  Takahiro Makino; Takashi Kaito; Yusuke Sakai; Shota Takenaka; Kazuomi Sugamoto; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Tracking low back pain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective cohort study protocol.

Authors:  Jean Théroux; Norman Stomski; Christopher J Hodgetts; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Bruce F Walker; Sylvie Le May; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2017-09-05

6.  The association of lumbar curve magnitude and spinal range of motion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kamil Eyvazov; Dino Samartzis; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Differences in vertebral morphology around the apical vertebrae between neuromuscular scoliosis and idiopathic scoliosis in skeletally immature patients: a three-dimensional morphometric analysis.

Authors:  Takahiro Makino; Yusuke Sakai; Masafumi Kashii; Shota Takenaka; Kazuomi Sugamoto; Hideki Yoshikawa; Takashi Kaito
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Assessment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from body scanner image by finite element simulations.

Authors:  Alexander T D Grünwald; Susmita Roy; Ana Alves-Pinto; Renée Lampe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.