| Literature DB >> 18441407 |
Innocent Takougang1, Phillipe Barbazan, Paul B Tchounwou, Emmanuel Noumi.
Abstract
Macroinvertebrates identification and enumeration may be used as a simple and affordable alternative to chemical analysis in water pollution monitoring. However, the ecological responses of various taxa to pollution are poorly known in resources-limited tropical countries. While freshwater macroinvertebrates have been used in the assessment of water quality in Europe and the Americas, investigations in Africa have mainly focused on snail hosts of human parasites. There is a need for sampling methods that can be used to assess both snails and other macroinvertebrates. The present study was designed to evaluate the usefulness of the freshwater snail dip scoop method in the study of macroinvertebrates for the assessment of the SOSUCAM sugar mill effluents pollution. Standard snail dip scoop samples were collected upstream and downstream of the factory effluent inputs, on the Mokona and Mengoala rivers. The analysis of the macroinvertebrate communities revealed the absence of Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera, and the thriving of Syrphidae in the sections of the rivers under high effluent load. The Shannon & Weaver diversity index was lower in these areas. The dip scoop sampling protocol was found to be a useful method for macroinvertebrates collection. Hence, this method is recommended as a simple, cost-effective and efficient tool for the bio-assessment of freshwater pollution in developing countries with limited research resources.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18441407 PMCID: PMC3684404 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph5020068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1:Location of sampling points on Rivers Mokona (A1–A5) and Mengoala (B1–B3) in Mbangjock, Cameroun
Aquatic and periaquatic plants of Mokona (A1–A5) and Mengoala (B1–B3) rivers in Mbandjock, Cameroon (September 1991 and April 1992)
| Poaceae | x | x | |||||||
| x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||
| x | |||||||||
| x | x | x | x | ||||||
| x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |||
| x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||
| Commelinaceae | |||||||||
| x | x | x | |||||||
| Basalminaceae | |||||||||
| x | |||||||||
| Cryperaceae | |||||||||
| x | x | x | x | x | |||||
| x | |||||||||
| Polygonaceae | |||||||||
| x | x | ||||||||
| Onagraceae | |||||||||
| x | |||||||||
| Mimosaceae | x | ||||||||
| Hydrocaritaceae | x | x | |||||||
x: Species present.
B1, A1, A2: Sampling point upstream of the point of confluence.
B3, A4, A5: Sampling point downstream of the point of confluence.
Water velocity (in m3/s) of Mokona, Mengoala rivers and the effluents of the SOSUCAM sugar factory in Mbandjock, Cameroon (P1: September 1991; P2: April 1992).
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Upstream | P1 | 0,47 | 0,16 |
| P2 | 0,39 | 0,13 | |
| Effluent | P1 | 0,03 | 0,01 |
| P2 | 0,06 | 0,0013 | |
| Downstream | P1 | 0,35 | 0,15 |
| P2 | |||
Data not collected
Macroinvertebrates count (per 10 dip scoops) in the Mokona (A1–A5) river in Mbandjock, Cameroon by factory activity status: P1-non operational (September 1991); P2- operational (April 1992)
|
| |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syrphidae | Larvae | 23 | 311 | 340 | 1 | ||||||||
| Chironomidae | Larvae | 94 | 40 | 74 | 115 | 145 | 25 | 6 | 15 | 1 | |||
| Ceratopogonidae | Larvae | 10 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Chaoboridae | Larvae | 2 | |||||||||||
| Culicidae | Larvae | 8 | 90 | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Naucoridae | Adults | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 | ||||||||
| Corixidae | Adults | 1 | 3 | 13 | 1 | 13 | |||||||
| Nepidae | Adults | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||
| Notonectidae | Adults | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||
| Mesoveliidae | Adults | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 20 | 1 | ||||||
| Veliidae | Adults | 3 | |||||||||||
| Gerridae | Adults | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 2 | |||||
| Hydrometridae | Adults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
| Pleidae | Adults | 6 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Atyidae | Adults | 9 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Hydraenidae | Adults | 1 | |||||||||||
| Hydrophilidae | Adults | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||||||
| Larvae | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||||||||
| Haliplidae | Adults | 3 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
| Gyrinidae | Larvae | 2 | |||||||||||
| Lymnebidae | larvae | 2 | |||||||||||
| Elmidae | Adults | 1 | 6 | 1 | |||||||||
| Larvae | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Dryopidae | Larvae | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Dytiscidae | Adults | 3 | 7 | ||||||||||
| Hygrobidae | larvae | 1 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Heptageniidae | Larvae | 4 | 6 | ||||||||||
| Caenidae | Larvae | 1 | |||||||||||
| Siphlonuridae | Larvae | 5 | 16 | 20 | |||||||||
| Ephemeridae | Larvae | 3 | 10 | ||||||||||
| Baetidae | Larvae | 2 | 5 | 10 | 110 | 32 | 15 | ||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Hydroptilidae | Larvae | 24 | |||||||||||
| Ecnomidae | Larvae | 3 | |||||||||||
| Phryganeidae | Larvae | 5 | |||||||||||
| 1 | |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Platycnemidae | Larvae | 2 | 1 | 15 | 1 | ||||||||
| Aeschimidae | Larvae | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Calopterygidae | Larvae | 9 | |||||||||||
| Coenagrionidae | Larvae | 5 | 2 | 12 | 1 | ||||||||
| Libellulidae | Larvae | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||
| Corduliidae | Larvae | 2 | 11 | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Planorbidae | 2 | 40 | 25 | 12 | |||||||||
| 9 | |||||||||||||
| Ferrissidae | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||
| lymnaeaidae | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Sphaeriidae | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Achaeta | Adults | 3 | |||||||||||
| Oligocheata | Adults | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||
| 31 | |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Total number of individuals | 143 | 53 | 124 | 246 | 28 | 311 | 321 | 08 | 106 | 353 | 78 | 138 | |
| Total number of taxa | 18 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 16 | 14 | |
P1: Factory non operational
P2: Factory operational
A1, A2: Sampling points upstream of point of confluence
A4, A5: Sampling points downstream
Point A3 was upstream at P1 and downstream at P2, as the course of the effluent was modified.
Macroinvertebrates count (per 10 dip scoops) in the Mengoala (B1–B3) river in Mbandjock (Cameroon) by factory activity status: P1-non operational (September 1991); P2- operational (April 1992)
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simuliidae | Nymphe | 1 | - | ||||||
| Syrphidae | Larvae | 494 | 507 | - | 73 | 320 | |||
| Chironomidae | Larvae | 29 | 150 | - | 25 | ||||
| Ceratopogonidae | Larvae | 76 | - | 1 | |||||
| Athericidae | Larvae | 11 | - | ||||||
| Culicidae | Larvae | - | 4 | 18 | |||||
| Sciomyzidae heteroptera | Larvae | 2 | |||||||
| Herbride | Larvae | 1 | |||||||
| Corixidae | Adults | 1 | - | 13 | 11 | ||||
| Nepidae | Adults | - | 1 | ||||||
| Notonectidae | Adults | 1 | - | 6 | |||||
| Mesoveliidae | Adults | 1 | - | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Veliidae | Adults | 1 | 2 | - | |||||
| Gerridae | Adults | 2 | - | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Hydrometridae | Adults | 2 | - | 3 | |||||
| Naucoridae | Adults | 4 | - | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Grapsidae | Adults | - | 1 | ||||||
| Atyidae plannipenna | Adults | 11 | 20 | - | |||||
| Osmylidae | Larvae | - | 1 | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Hydrophilidae | Larvae | 3 | 2 | - | 6 | 2 | |||
| Adults | 2 | - | 1 | ||||||
| Haliplidae | Adults | - | 3 | ||||||
| Lymnebidae | Adults | - | 2 | ||||||
| Gyrinidae | Adults | 2 | - | 2 | |||||
| Elmidae | Adults | 3 | - | 1 | |||||
| Dryopidae | Adults | - | 2 | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Perlidae | Larvae | - | 1 | ||||||
| Siphlonuridae | Larvae | 9 | 8 | - | 349 | ||||
| potamanthidae | Larvae | 2 | - | ||||||
| Baetidae | Larvae | 260 | - | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Platycnemidae | Larvae | 1 | - | 1 | |||||
|
| |||||||||
| lymnaeaidae | Adults | 2 | - | 1 | |||||
| Planorbidae | Adults | - | 5 | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Total number of individuals | 64 | 458 | 498 | 594 | - | 86 | 412 | 362 | |
| Total number of Taxa | 12 | 13 | 1 | 3 | - | 5 | 16 | 9 | |
P1: Factory non operational; P2: Factory operational; B1: Sampling points upstream of point of confluence
B2, B3: Sampling points downstream of point of confluence.
Figure 2:Effects of a sugar mill effluent on the longitudinal distribution of macroinvertebrates in the Mokona (A1–A5) River in Mbandjock (Cameroun)
Figure 3:Effect of a sugar mill effluent on the longitudinal distribution of Diptera on the Mokona (A1–A5) river in Mbandjock, Cameroon.
Figure 4:Effect of the Mbandjock sugar mill operational status on the longitudinal distribution of macroinvertebrates on the Mengoala (B1–B3) river
Figure 5:Effect of effluents of SOSUCAM sugar mill effluents on the Shannon & Weaver diversity index of macroinvertebrates in the Mengoala (B1–B3) and Mokona (A1–A5) rivers in Mbandjock, Cameroon.