Literature DB >> 18441322

Four-year follow-up of treatment with intramyocardial skeletal myoblasts injection in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Caroline E Veltman1, Osama I I Soliman, Marcel L Geleijnse, Wim B Vletter, Pieter C Smits, Folkert J ten Cate, Luc J Jordaens, Aggie H H M Balk, Patrick W Serruys, Eric Boersma, Ron T van Domburg, Wim J van der Giessen.   

Abstract

AIMS: Studies reporting improved left ventricular (LV) function of percutaneous skeletal myoblast (SkM) injection in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy had follow-up not exceeding 12 months, and did not include a control group. Our group has reported evidence for myoblast efficacy in the first five out of the 14 treated patients. The objective of the present evaluation was to assess if these effects were sustained at long-term follow-up. We compared function of patients treated with SkM 4 years earlier with a matched control group. Secondary endpoints included mortality, NYHA class, N-terminal pro-B-natriuretic peptide levels, incidence of arrhythmias, and quality of life. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Fourteen patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy who underwent SkM injection were compared with 28 non-randomized control patients matched for age, sex, location, and extent of myocardial infarction. Contrast echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) was performed to compare global and regional LV function. At 4-year follow-up, three patients (21%) had died in the treated group and 11 patients (39%) in the control group (P = 0.8). In the survivors, LV ejection fraction (EF) was 35 +/- 10% and 37 +/- 9% in the SkM group and 36 +/- 8% and 36 +/- 6% in the controls at baseline and 4 years follow-up, respectively (P = 0.96 between groups at follow-up). TDI-derived systolic velocity in the injected sites was 5.4 +/- 1.8 cm/s in the SkM group when compared with 5.1 +/- 1.6 cm/s in corresponding sites in the control group (P = 0.47). None of the secondary endpoints showed a difference between the groups. However, in the patients fitted with an internal cardioverter defibrillator, more arrhythmias leading to interventions occurred in the treated group than in the control group, 87% and 13%, respectively (P = 0.015).
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous intramyocardial SkM injection in ischaemic cardiomyopathy has no sustained positive effect on resting global or regional LV function, respectively, at 4-year follow-up. Moreover, the procedure may induce a higher risk of developing serious arrhythmias, but larger patient series are required before more precise characterization of the safety and efficacy profile of the procedure is possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18441322     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  18 in total

Review 1.  Cell delivery routes for stem cell therapy to the heart: current and future approaches.

Authors:  Niall G Campbell; Ken Suzuki
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Cell therapy for heart failure: a comprehensive overview of experimental and clinical studies, current challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Santosh K Sanganalmath; Roberto Bolli
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 3.  Cell-based therapies for cardiac disease: a cellular therapist's perspective.

Authors:  Pampee P Young; Richard Schäfer
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 4.  Arrhythmogenesis: a Roadblock to Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy.

Authors:  Yen-Wen Liu; Chi-Ting Su; Christopher Y T Yen; Li-Jen Lin; Patrick C H Hsieh
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-10

Review 5.  Periprocedural adverse events in cell therapy trials in myocardial infarction and cardiomyopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paulino A Alvarez; Ernst R Schwarz; Rajesh Ramineni; Phil Myatt; Clay Barbin; Carlos Boissonnet; Anita Phan; Aldo Maggioni; Alejandro Barbagelata
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Stem cell therapy is proarrhythmic.

Authors:  Ester Macia; Penelope A Boyden
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Gene and cell therapy for heart failure.

Authors:  Ebo D de Muinck
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.401

8.  Extending flaps lifts an infarcted heart toward repair.

Authors:  Gianni Angelini; Massimo Caputo; Paolo Madeddu
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 11.454

9.  Advances in cell transplantation therapy for diseased myocardium.

Authors:  Outi M Villet; Antti Siltanen; Tommi Pätilä; M Ali A Mahar; Antti Vento; Esko Kankuri; Ari Harjula
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 5.443

10.  Stem cells therapy for cardiovascular repair in ischemic heart disease: How to predict and secure optimal outcome?

Authors:  Jens Kastrup
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 6.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.