PURPOSE: To investigate the patient and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging characteristics associated with clinical failure after uterine artery embolization (UAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent UAE were examined. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging was performed before and 4 months after the procedure, and clinical follow-up was performed at 15 months. Patients were divided into success and failure groups strictly on the basis of their clinical outcomes. Clinical follow-up included evaluation of fibroid symptoms and the need for further treatment after UAE. Findings at pre- and postprocedural MR imaging were compared, and data collected included changes in uterine and fibroid volumes, fibroid location, and fibroid perfusion. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were placed into the success group and 20 into the failure group. There were no differences between the baseline characteristics of the two groups. The reduction in uterine and dominant fibroid volumes was greater in the success group compared with the failure group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (success group: [295/845] 34.9% vs [80/282.5] 28.3%, respectively, P=.18; failure group: [317/733] 43.2% vs [114/337.6] 33.9%, P=.32). The reduction in total fibroid volume was greater in the success group than the failure group ([189.6/393.5] 48.2% vs [148.7/439.9] 33.8%, respectively; P=.02) despite the fact that the percentage of fibroids completely infarcted was similar between the two groups ([136/172] 79% vs [41/50] 82%, P=.77). Pedunculated subserosal fibroids were more common in the failure group than in the success group (P<.03) and did not reduce in volume as significantly (53.8% vs 14.7%, respectively; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: In general, the reduction in total fibroid volume after embolization is smaller in patients with poor clinical improvement. In addition, these patients have a higher number of pedunculated subserosal fibroids, and these fibroids tend to reduce in volume to a lesser extent.
PURPOSE: To investigate the patient and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging characteristics associated with clinical failure after uterine artery embolization (UAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent UAE were examined. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging was performed before and 4 months after the procedure, and clinical follow-up was performed at 15 months. Patients were divided into success and failure groups strictly on the basis of their clinical outcomes. Clinical follow-up included evaluation of fibroid symptoms and the need for further treatment after UAE. Findings at pre- and postprocedural MR imaging were compared, and data collected included changes in uterine and fibroid volumes, fibroid location, and fibroid perfusion. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were placed into the success group and 20 into the failure group. There were no differences between the baseline characteristics of the two groups. The reduction in uterine and dominant fibroid volumes was greater in the success group compared with the failure group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (success group: [295/845] 34.9% vs [80/282.5] 28.3%, respectively, P=.18; failure group: [317/733] 43.2% vs [114/337.6] 33.9%, P=.32). The reduction in total fibroid volume was greater in the success group than the failure group ([189.6/393.5] 48.2% vs [148.7/439.9] 33.8%, respectively; P=.02) despite the fact that the percentage of fibroids completely infarcted was similar between the two groups ([136/172] 79% vs [41/50] 82%, P=.77). Pedunculated subserosal fibroids were more common in the failure group than in the success group (P<.03) and did not reduce in volume as significantly (53.8% vs 14.7%, respectively; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: In general, the reduction in total fibroid volume after embolization is smaller in patients with poor clinical improvement. In addition, these patients have a higher number of pedunculated subserosal fibroids, and these fibroids tend to reduce in volume to a lesser extent.
Authors: Andrea Franconeri; Jieming Fang; Benjamin Carney; Almamoon Justaniah; Laura Miller; Hye-Chun Hur; Louise P King; Roa Alammari; Salomao Faintuch; Koenraad J Mortele; Olga R Brook Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Xia; Z Jing; H Zhi-Yu; C Jian-Ming; Z Hong-Yu; X Rui-Fang; Y Yu; H Yan-Li; D Bao-Wei Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2014-06-20 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Anna Maria Ierardi; Valeria Savasi; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Mario Petrillo; Sara Sbaraini; Antonio Pinto; Francesco Hanozet; Anna Maria Marconi; Gianpaolo Carrafiello Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Piotr Czuczwar; Sławomir Woźniak; Piotr Szkodziak; Ewa Woźniakowska; Maciej Paszkowski; Wojciech Wrona; Paweł Milart; Tomasz Paszkowski; Michał Popajewski Journal: Prz Menopauzalny Date: 2014-09-09