Literature DB >> 18439375

Seasonal cholera from multiple small outbreaks, rural Bangladesh.

O Colin Stine1, Munirul Alam, Li Tang, G Balakrish Nair, A Kasem Siddique, Shah M Faruque, Anwar Huq, Rita Colwell, R Bradley Sack, J Glenn Morris.   

Abstract

Clinical and environmental Vibrio cholerae organisms collected from February 2004 through April 2005 were systematically isolated from 2 rural Bangladeshi locales. Their genetic relatedness was evaluated at 5 loci that contained a variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR). The observed minimal overlap in VNTR patterns between the 2 communities was consistent with sequential, small outbreaks from local sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18439375      PMCID: PMC2600222          DOI: 10.3201/eid1405.071116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Cholera is a major cause of illness in the developing world. The World Health Organization reported in 2006 that 236,896 cases of cholera occurred in 52 countries, a 79% increase over 2005 (). Although major advances in the understanding of the molecular basis of Vibrio cholerae pathogenicity have been made, including defining the environmental reservoirs for the microorganism (–), we do not fully understand the cause of seasonal epidemics in cholera-endemic areas nor the factors that drive epidemics. Specifically, whether these seasonal epidemics arise from a single clonal strain or reflect superimposition of multiple small outbreaks is not clear.

The Study

From February 2004 through April 2005, we systematically collected clinical and environmental V. cholerae from Bakerganj and Mathbaria, 2 small communities 50 miles apart in the southern part of coastal Bangladesh. Samples were collected on 3 consecutive days every 2 weeks throughout the year. Clinical isolates were collected from ≈20% of all patients who had symptoms of cholera when seen at the local clinics. Environmental isolates were cultured from water, sediment, and plankton samples taken at 6 sites (ponds or river sites) in each of the 2 communities. The same sites were used throughout the 15-month study, and the same method was applied at all sites and across all time points. Isolation was performed by standard culture methods, and V. cholerae was identified by a combination of biochemical (), molecular, and serologic techniques (). All samples were collected according to protocols approved by Institutional Review Boards at Johns Hopkins University, University of Maryland, and the International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh. For multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) determinations, each locus was PCR amplified by using standard conditions and appropriate primers from the literature () (Technical Appendix). The resulting fragments were sequenced by using Big Dye Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Trace files were generated by using an ABI 3730xl automatic sequencer and read using either 1) the Phred (,), Phrap (www.washington.edu), or Consed () package or 2) Sequencher (AGCT, Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). A total of 391 environmental and clinical isolates of V. cholerae were collected and identified from February 2004 through April 2005. Of these, 267 environmental isolates were identified as belonging to non-O1 and non-O139 serogroups and did not carry the gene for cholera toxin (ctx). Analysis of these 267 by MLST (using the 7 loci identified previously []) yielded a genetic background that was distinct from that of the clinical/epidemic strains. The other 68 (20%) of 335 environmental V. cholerae isolates shared a genetic background identical or nearly identical to clinical/epidemic V. cholerae. These 68 and all 56 clinical isolates collected (all of which were related by MLST) were further analyzed by examining 5 VNTR loci. Sequence typing was based on 5 polymorphic VNTR loci. These loci were identified with the program Tandem Repeat Finder (). Four of the 5 loci had hexameric repeats in coding regions. The loci were identified by those genes in which they occur: VC0147vntr, VC0436–7vntr (intergenic), VC1650vntr, VC0171vntr, and VCA0283vntr. Alleles were distinguished by the number of tandem repeats as determined by Tandem Repeat Finder () (Technical Appendix). Sequences from 1 locus with identical numbers of repeats were assigned to the identical allele. The alleles at the 5 loci were ordered to generate a sequence type (ST), for example, 3,5,2,2,8. Each locus was polymorphic with 7, 6, 6, 20, and 16 alleles, respectively. Thirty-six STs were observed. The various STs were defined as related if they were identical at 4 of the 5 loci. When we defined a VNTR genetic group as differing by a single locus variant from another member of the group, 3 large VNTR genetic groups were identified and 5 VNTR genetic groups composed of only 2 isolates and 7 unrelated strains. These 7 singletons differed from all other STs at 2 or more loci. There was statistically significant agreement between serogroup and VNTR genetic group. For V. cholerae O139, all STs were 4,1,1,x,x (Technical Appendix). Thus, the isolates were considered to be related because x,x = 1,1; 2,1; or 2,8, i.e., a change in a single locus serially connected all isolates. Summing the number of isolates of a sequence type, we found that the 23 ctx+ O139 strains formed a VNTR genetic group. A second group comprised 75 ctx+ O1 Inaba isolates. Finally, 18 ctx+ O1 Ogawa clustered into 3 additional VNTR genetic groups. There were 10 exceptions, i.e., 3 non-O1, non-O139 ctx+ isolates were in groups; 3 ctx– O139, 2 ctx– O1 Inaba, 1 ctx–, and 1 ctx+ O1 Ogawa were not. We found that Bakerganj and Mathbaria yielded distinct V. cholerae populations; only 2 (ST 3,5,2,2,7 and 1,1,3,9,8) of 36 STs identified were found at both locations (Table 1; Technical Appendix). There was substantial divergence in STs among strains isolated from patients, compared with strains from the environment in Mathbaria; only 1 (ST 3,5,2,2,7) of 16 STs were found in both patient and environmental isolates. Similarly, in Bakerganj, only 2 (ST 3,5,2,2,6 and 3,5,2,1,5) of 24 STs were found in both clinical and environmental isolates.
Table 1

Number of Vibrio cholerae sequence types in distinct serotypes and sample types in Bakerganj and Mathbaria, Bangladesh, 2004–2005

SerotypeSourceBakerganjMathbaria
O1 InabaClinic107
Environment71
O1 OgawaClinic66
Environment10
O139Environment03
Clinical or environmental isolates from a given period were more likely to have a common ST (Technical Appendix). For example, at Mathbaria, 49 of the 53 isolates with an ST identical to that of another isolate were found in the same or neighboring month. Similarly, at Bakerganj, 33 of 36 isolates with identical STs were found in the same or neighboring month. Variation in the VNTR loci appeared to be greater among clinical isolates than among environmental isolates. A total of 29 STs occurred in clinical isolates, whereas only 12 occurred in environmental isolates (Table 1). When we controlled for location and month of collection (Table 2), the total number of STs among environmental isolates (7 ST/35 isolates) was less than that among clinical isolates (16 ST/32 isolates) (χ2 = 4.4, df 1, p = 0.036). Common STs were found among environmental isolates, despite the isolates coming from samples from different ponds and distinct subsamples (e.g., water, phytoplankton, zooplankton).
Table 2

Sequence type (ST) variations among Vibrio cholerae O1 Inaba isolates from environmental and clinical sources by month of collection, Bangladesh, 2004–2005

LocationDateSourceNo. pondsNo. isolatesNo. STsVariation*
Mathbaria2004 DecEnvironment41210.08
Bakerganj2004 SepEnvironment51640.25
Bakerganj2005 AprEnvironment4720.29
Bakerganj2004 OctClinic940.44
Mathbaria2004 MayClinic1150.45
Mathbaria2004 AprClinic840.50
Bakerganj2004 DecClinic430.75

*Variation, no. STs/no. isolates.

*Variation, no. STs/no. isolates.

Conclusions

Our data do not support the concept of seasonal cholera epidemics occurring by movement of a single clonal wave across the countryside. They are consistent, instead, with the natural occurrence of V. cholerae year-round in the aquatic environment of each site, with each site having its own, distinct grouping of strains (,). The limited overlap between STs in environmental and clinical isolates is an enigma that remains to be resolved. However, the extensive variation in VNTR STs in this short time frame and small geographic area suggests that VNTR STs can be useful in assessing genetic relatedness of isolates during outbreaks/epidemics. The strong temporal clustering of the variation arising in the VNTR STs of clinical isolates is consistent with the hypothesis that clinical cases reflect the occurrence of multiple small outbreaks. Our data are drawn from rural Bangladesh; however, cholera is a global disease. Its epidemiology may well differ in sub-Saharan Africa, the Americas, or other parts of Asia, or in the mega-cities that are increasingly the hallmark of the developing world. These variations emphasize the need for application of similar techniques in these diverse settings.
  12 in total

1.  Cholera 2005.

Authors: 
Journal:  Wkly Epidemiol Rec       Date:  2006-08-04

2.  Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences.

Authors:  G Benson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities.

Authors:  B Ewing; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Vibrio species of medical importance.

Authors:  D L Tison; M T Kelly
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Enumeration of Vibrio cholerae O1 in Bangladesh waters by fluorescent-antibody direct viable count.

Authors:  P R Brayton; M L Tamplin; A Huq; R R Colwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae in the aquatic environment of Mathbaria, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Munirul Alam; Marzia Sultana; G Balakrish Nair; R Bradley Sack; David A Sack; A K Siddique; Afsar Ali; Anwar Huq; Rita R Colwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Cholera in Lima, Peru, correlates with prior isolation of Vibrio cholerae from the environment.

Authors:  A A Franco; A D Fix; A Prada; E Paredes; J C Palomino; A C Wright; J A Johnson; R McCarter; H Guerra; J G Morris
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  Global climate and infectious disease: the cholera paradigm.

Authors:  R R Colwell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Ecological relationships between Vibrio cholerae and planktonic crustacean copepods.

Authors:  A Huq; E B Small; P A West; M I Huq; R Rahman; R R Colwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Molecular epidemiology of O139 Vibrio cholerae: mutation, lateral gene transfer, and founder flush.

Authors:  Pallavi Garg; Antonia Aydanian; David Smith; Morris J Glenn; G Balakrish Nair; O Colin Stine
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  41 in total

1.  Environmental factors influencing epidemic cholera.

Authors:  Antarpreet Jutla; Elizabeth Whitcombe; Nur Hasan; Bradd Haley; Ali Akanda; Anwar Huq; Munir Alam; R Bradley Sack; Rita Colwell
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Population vulnerability to biannual cholera outbreaks and associated macro-scale drivers in the Bengal Delta.

Authors:  Ali Shafqat Akanda; Antarpreet S Jutla; David M Gute; R Bradley Sack; Munirul Alam; Anwar Huq; Rita R Colwell; Shafiqul Islam
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 3.  Circulation and transmission of clones of Vibrio cholerae during cholera outbreaks.

Authors:  O Colin Stine; J Glenn Morris
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  A metalloprotease secreted by the type II secretion system links Vibrio cholerae with collagen.

Authors:  Bo R Park; Ryszard A Zielke; Igor H Wierzbicki; Kristie C Mitchell; Jeffrey H Withey; Aleksandra E Sikora
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Phenotypic and genetic characterization of Vibrio cholerae O1 clinical isolates collected through national antimicrobial resistance surveillance network in Nepal.

Authors:  Geeta Shakya; Dong Wook Kim; John D Clemens; Sarala Malla; Bishnu Prasad Upadhyaya; Shyam Prakash Dumre; Sirjana Devi Shrestha; Shailaja Adhikari; Supriya Sharma; Nisha Rijal; Sanjaya K Shrestha; Carl Mason; Palpasa Kansakar
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  A European epidemiological survey of Vibrio splendidus clade shows unexplored diversity and massive exchange of virulence factors.

Authors:  H Nasfi; M A Travers; J de Lorgeril; C Habib; T Sannie; L Sorieul; J Gerard; J C Avarre; P Haffner; D Tourbiez; T Renault; D Furones; A Roque; C Pruzzo; D Cheslett; R Gdoura; T Vallaeys
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Molecular Epidemiology of Cholera Outbreaks during the Rainy Season in Mandalay, Myanmar.

Authors:  Amonrattana Roobthaisong; Kazuhisa Okada; Nilar Htun; Wah Wah Aung; Warawan Wongboot; Watcharaporn Kamjumphol; Aye Aye Han; Yi Yi; Shigeyuki Hamada
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Role of zooplankton diversity in Vibrio cholerae population dynamics and in the incidence of cholera in the Bangladesh Sundarbans.

Authors:  Guillaume Constantin de Magny; Pronob K Mozumder; Christopher J Grim; Nur A Hasan; M Niamul Naser; Munirul Alam; R Bradley Sack; Anwar Huq; Rita R Colwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Informal urban settlements and cholera risk in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  Katherine Penrose; Marcia Caldas de Castro; Japhet Werema; Edward T Ryan
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-03-16

10.  Comparative genomics of the family Vibrionaceae reveals the wide distribution of genes encoding virulence-associated proteins.

Authors:  Timothy G Lilburn; Jianying Gu; Hong Cai; Yufeng Wang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.