BACKGROUND: Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with respect to the interventricular (V-V) interval is mainly limited to pacing at a resting heart rate. We studied the effect of higher stimulation rates with univentricular and biventricular (BiV) pacing modes including the effect of the V-V interval optimization. METHODS: In 36 patients with heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation (AF), the effects of right ventricular (RV), left ventricular (LV), simultaneous BiV, and optimized sequential BiV (BiVopt) pacing were measured. The effect of the pacing mode and the optimal V-V interval was determined at stimulation rates of 70, 90, and 110 ppm using invasive measurement of the maximum rate of left ventricular pressure rise (LV dP/dt(max)). RESULTS: The average LV dP/dt (max) for all pacing modalities at stimulation rates of 70, 90, and 110 ppm was 781 +/- 176, 833 +/- 197, and 884 +/- 223 mmHg/s for RV pacing; 893 +/- 178, 942 +/- 186, and 981 +/- 194 mmHg/s for LV pacing; 904 +/- 179, 973 +/- 187, and 1052 +/- 206 mmHg/s for simultaneous BiV pacing; and 941 +/- 186, 1010 +/- 198, and 1081 +/- 206 mmHg/s for BiVopt pacing, respectively. In BiVopt pacing, the corresponding optimal V-V interval decreased from 34 +/- 29, 28 +/- 28, and21 +/- 27ms at stimulation rates of 70, 90, and 110 ppm, respectively. In two individuals, LV dP/dt(max) decreased when the pacing rate was increased from 90 to 110 ppm. CONCLUSION: In patients with AF and heart failure, LV dP/dt(max) increases for all pacing modalities at increasing stimulation rates in most, but not all, patients. The rise in LV dP/dt(max) with increasing stimulation rates is higher in biventricular (BiV and BiVopt) than in univentricular (LV and RV) pacing. The optimal V-V interval at sequential biventricular pacing decreases with increasing stimulation rates.
BACKGROUND: Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with respect to the interventricular (V-V) interval is mainly limited to pacing at a resting heart rate. We studied the effect of higher stimulation rates with univentricular and biventricular (BiV) pacing modes including the effect of the V-V interval optimization. METHODS: In 36 patients with heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation (AF), the effects of right ventricular (RV), left ventricular (LV), simultaneous BiV, and optimized sequential BiV (BiVopt) pacing were measured. The effect of the pacing mode and the optimal V-V interval was determined at stimulation rates of 70, 90, and 110 ppm using invasive measurement of the maximum rate of left ventricular pressure rise (LV dP/dt(max)). RESULTS: The average LV dP/dt (max) for all pacing modalities at stimulation rates of 70, 90, and 110 ppm was 781 +/- 176, 833 +/- 197, and 884 +/- 223 mmHg/s for RV pacing; 893 +/- 178, 942 +/- 186, and 981 +/- 194 mmHg/s for LV pacing; 904 +/- 179, 973 +/- 187, and 1052 +/- 206 mmHg/s for simultaneous BiV pacing; and 941 +/- 186, 1010 +/- 198, and 1081 +/- 206 mmHg/s for BiVopt pacing, respectively. In BiVopt pacing, the corresponding optimal V-V interval decreased from 34 +/- 29, 28 +/- 28, and21 +/- 27ms at stimulation rates of 70, 90, and 110 ppm, respectively. In two individuals, LV dP/dt(max) decreased when the pacing rate was increased from 90 to 110 ppm. CONCLUSION: In patients with AF and heart failure, LV dP/dt(max) increases for all pacing modalities at increasing stimulation rates in most, but not all, patients. The rise in LV dP/dt(max) with increasing stimulation rates is higher in biventricular (BiV and BiVopt) than in univentricular (LV and RV) pacing. The optimal V-V interval at sequential biventricular pacing decreases with increasing stimulation rates.
Authors: Manav Sohal; Shoaib Hamid; Giovanni Perego; Paolo Della Bella; Shaumik Adhya; John Paisey; Tim Betts; Ravi Kamdar; Pier Lambiase; Francisco Leyva; Janet M McComb; Jonathan Behar; Thomas Jackson; Simon Claridge; Vishal Mehta; Mark Elliott; Steven Niederer; Reza Razavi; C Aldo Rinaldi Journal: Heart Rhythm O2 Date: 2021-01-22