Literature DB >> 18439049

Use of secondary prevention drug therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome after hospital discharge.

Helen Y Lee1, Catherine E Cooke, Teisha A Robertson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome includes life-threatening clinical conditions ranging from unstable angina to non-Q-wave myocardial infarction and Q-wave myocardial infarction that are a major cause of emergency medical care and hospitalization in the United States. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines on the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (2002-2004) recommend (1) angiotensinconverting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for ACE inhibitor intolerance, (2) beta-blockers, and (3) statins for long-term treatment of patients after an acute coronary event.
OBJECTIVE: To examine rates of use of 3 key evidence-based drug therapies (ACE inhibitors/ARBs, beta-blockers, and statins) after hospital discharge for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
METHODS: The study cohort was identified using medical claims from commercial health plans within a managed care organization located in the Mid-Atlantic states, with approximately 3.4 million members with medical benefits of whom 1.2 million members (35.3%) had pharmacy benefits. Members were included if they were (1) aged >or= 18 years, (2) continuously enrolled with the same commercial plan from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2005, (3) had any medical claims for hospitalization for ACS defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes 410.xx (acute myocardial infarction) or 411.1 (intermediate coronary syndrome) during the sample identification period from July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004, and (4) had no medical claims for ACS hospitalizations from January 1, 2003, through June 30, 2003, in any of 10 diagnosis fields on an inpatient hospital claim. Pharmacy claims for ACE inhibitors, ARBs, beta-blockers, and statins were obtained for 18 months following each index date, defined as the earliest ACS diagnosis date during the identification period. Utilization was defined as the member having at least 1 pharmacy claim within each class from index date to 3 months post-index date. Five time periods were examined to assess therapy: - 180 to 0 days (6 months prior), 0 to 90 days (3 months), 0 to 180 days (6 months), 0 to 365 days (12 months), and 0 to 548 days (18 months) following the index date. ACE inhibitors and ARBs were considered together (i.e., a patient had to have at least 1 pharmacy claim for an ACE inhibitor or an ARB). Logistic regression analyses were used to predict use of the 3 drug classes for patients with different clinical (diagnosis and prior use) and demographic (sex and age) characteristics.
RESULTS: The study cohort included 1,135 patients (0.27% of 424,526 continuously enrolled members) with ACS as defined by ICD-9-CM codes in medical claims from July 1, 2003, to June 30, 2004. Nearly 65% of the sample patients were men (n = 734 men and n = 401 women), with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 63.8 (SD 13.1) years. Of the 1,135 members with ACS, 588 (51.8%) had at least 1 pharmacy claim for an ACE inhibitor or ARB, 725 (63.9%) for a beta-blocker, and 710 (62.6%) for a statin during the 3-month follow-up period; receipt of at least 1 prescription in all 3 classes was found in 339 (29.9%) of patients. Patients who were aged < 45 years, 65-79 years, and e 80 years were significantly less likely than patients aged 45-64 years to receive statins (P < 0.05). In addition, patients who were aged e 80 years were significantly less likely to receive ACE inhibitors/ARBs (P = 0.003), beta-blockers (P < 0.001), or all 3 classes (P = 0.002). Women were less likely than men to receive statins (P = 0.004) and all 3 drug classes (P = 0.012). Patients with intermediate coronary syndrome were significantly less likely than those with acute myocardial infarction to receive any of the study drugs (P < 0.001). Those patients who had used ACE inhibitors/ARBs, beta-blockers, statins, and all 3 drug classes during the 6 months prior to the index diagnosis of ACS were more likely than those without prior use (odds ratios of 12.2, 9.4, 8.3, and 4.9, respectively, P < 0.001) to have these medications continued after ACS diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: At 3 months following the index ACS hospitalization, the majority of the patients were not receiving the 3 guideline medication therapies. ACS patients with intermediate coronary syndrome and those aged 80 years or older were less likely to be receiving any of the 3 therapies, and women were less likely than men to receive statin therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18439049     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.3.271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm        ISSN: 1083-4087


  37 in total

1.  Changes in short- and long-term cardiovascular risk of incident diabetes and incident myocardial infarction--a nationwide study.

Authors:  M L Norgaard; S S Andersen; T K Schramm; F Folke; C H Jørgensen; M L Hansen; C Andersson; D M Bretler; A Vaag; L Køber; C Torp-Pedersen; G H Gislason
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Use of the recommended drug combination for secondary prevention after a first occurrence of acute coronary syndrome in France.

Authors:  J Bezin; A Pariente; R Lassalle; C Dureau-Pournin; A Abouelfath; P Robinson; N Moore; C Droz-Perroteau; A Fourrier-Reglat
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Validation of a Cardiovascular Disease Policy Microsimulation Model Using Both Survival and Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves.

Authors:  Ankur Pandya; Stephen Sy; Sylvia Cho; Sartaj Alam; Milton C Weinstein; Thomas A Gaziano
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Development of reusable logic for determination of statin exposure-time from electronic health records.

Authors:  Aaron W Miller; Catherine A McCarty; Ulrich Broeckel; Vangelis Hytopoulos; Deanna S Cross
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 5.  Medication adherence in patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia: associated factors and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  Lucas N Marzec; Thomas M Maddox
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  An empirical comparison of key statistical attributes among potential ICU quality indicators.

Authors:  Sydney E S Brown; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Approaches to Address Premature Death of Patients When Assessing Patterns of Use of Health Care Services After an Index Event.

Authors:  Montika Bush; Ross J Simpson; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Gang Fang; Til Stürmer; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Quality of osteoporosis care of older Medicare recipients with fragility fractures: 2006 to 2010.

Authors:  Stephen K Liu; Jeffrey C Munson; John-Erik Bell; Rebecca L Zaha; John N Mecchella; Anna N A Tosteson; Nancy E Morden
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Use of evidence-based pharmacotherapy after myocardial infarction in Estonia.

Authors:  Toomas Marandi; Aleksei Baburin; Tiia Ainla
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Effect of exposure to evidence-based pharmacotherapy on outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in older adults.

Authors:  Ilene H Zuckerman; Xianghua Yin; Gail B Rattinger; Stephen S Gottlieb; Linda Simoni-Wastila; Sarah A Pierce; Ting-Ying Huang; Rahul Shenolikar; Bruce Stuart
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.