Paul J Healy1, Philip S Helliwell. 1. Wellington Regional Rheumatology Unit, Hutt Valley District Health Board, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. paul.healy@huttvalleydhb.org.nz
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess currently available tools for measurement of enthesitis and to develop a new instrument specifically for use in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with PsA underwent clinical assessment over a period of 6 months after change of disease-modifying therapy, usually to methotrexate. Measures of enthesitis included the Mander Enthesitis Index (MEI), the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score, the Major index, and the Gladman index. Data from these assessments were used to develop a new enthesitis index, the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI). RESULTS: An iterative process of data reduction enabled derivation of the LEI index, which consisted of 6 sites: right and left Achilles insertions, medial femoral condyles, and lateral epicondyles of the humerus. All measures showed significant change from baseline but only the LEI and Gladman indices showed a large effect size. All indices demonstrated a floor effect (a score of 0 when the MEI is >0) but this was minimal for the LEI index. All indices correlated strongly with each other and other measures of disease activity. CONCLUSION: The LEI is a new enthesitis index designed for use in PsA. It shows good test characteristics that suggest it will be a robust and reliable assessment tool. We suggest that it be adopted for use in any randomized controlled trials and longitudinal observation cohorts involving patients with PsA.
OBJECTIVE: To assess currently available tools for measurement of enthesitis and to develop a new instrument specifically for use in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with PsA underwent clinical assessment over a period of 6 months after change of disease-modifying therapy, usually to methotrexate. Measures of enthesitis included the Mander Enthesitis Index (MEI), the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score, the Major index, and the Gladman index. Data from these assessments were used to develop a new enthesitis index, the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI). RESULTS: An iterative process of data reduction enabled derivation of the LEI index, which consisted of 6 sites: right and left Achilles insertions, medial femoral condyles, and lateral epicondyles of the humerus. All measures showed significant change from baseline but only the LEI and Gladman indices showed a large effect size. All indices demonstrated a floor effect (a score of 0 when the MEI is >0) but this was minimal for the LEI index. All indices correlated strongly with each other and other measures of disease activity. CONCLUSION: The LEI is a new enthesitis index designed for use in PsA. It shows good test characteristics that suggest it will be a robust and reliable assessment tool. We suggest that it be adopted for use in any randomized controlled trials and longitudinal observation cohorts involving patients with PsA.
Authors: Laura C Coates; Anna R Moverley; Lucy McParland; Sarah Brown; Nuria Navarro-Coy; John L O'Dwyer; David M Meads; Paul Emery; Philip G Conaghan; Philip S Helliwell Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 79.321