BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have demonstrated the feasibility of peroral transgastric endoscopic procedures in porcine models. We present our experience with these procedures in a porcine survival model and expose the technical difficulties and worries about their application in humans. METHODS: We performed the following transgastric procedures in nine small pigs (20-30 kg) under general anesthesia using a double-channel therapeutic endoscope: peritoneoscopy (nine pigs), cholecystectomy (six pigs), gastrojejunal anastomosis (two pigs), and fallopian tube excision (one pig). Postsurgical complications and survival of the pigs were recorded during a 3-week follow-up. RESULTS: In six pigs, the gallbladder was successfully resected. The time of the procedure ranged from 2.5 to 3.5 hours. In one case, severe bleeding occurred from the cystic artery during dissection and was successfully managed by placement of endoscopic clips. Five pigs survived for 3 weeks after cholecystectomy. In one pig, severe peritonitis developed because of gastric contents leakage due to failure of gastric closure and the animal was euthanized 3 days after the procedure. Endoscopic transgastric gastrojejunostomy was successfully performed in two pigs without major complications. The time required for the procedure averaged about 50 min. Fallopian tube excision was also successful in one pig without any complications. The entire procedure was performed within 60 min. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the feasibility of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures in a porcine survival model and impresses the efficacy, the safety, the complications, and some technical difficulties of transgastric NOTES procedures, which merit further evaluation in future studies.
BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have demonstrated the feasibility of peroral transgastric endoscopic procedures in porcine models. We present our experience with these procedures in a porcine survival model and expose the technical difficulties and worries about their application in humans. METHODS: We performed the following transgastric procedures in nine small pigs (20-30 kg) under general anesthesia using a double-channel therapeutic endoscope: peritoneoscopy (nine pigs), cholecystectomy (six pigs), gastrojejunal anastomosis (two pigs), and fallopian tube excision (one pig). Postsurgical complications and survival of the pigs were recorded during a 3-week follow-up. RESULTS: In six pigs, the gallbladder was successfully resected. The time of the procedure ranged from 2.5 to 3.5 hours. In one case, severe bleeding occurred from the cystic artery during dissection and was successfully managed by placement of endoscopic clips. Five pigs survived for 3 weeks after cholecystectomy. In one pig, severe peritonitis developed because of gastric contents leakage due to failure of gastric closure and the animal was euthanized 3 days after the procedure. Endoscopic transgastric gastrojejunostomy was successfully performed in two pigs without major complications. The time required for the procedure averaged about 50 min. Fallopian tube excision was also successful in one pig without any complications. The entire procedure was performed within 60 min. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the feasibility of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures in a porcine survival model and impresses the efficacy, the safety, the complications, and some technical difficulties of transgastric NOTES procedures, which merit further evaluation in future studies.
Authors: Keiichi Ikeda; Annette Fritscher-Ravens; C Alexander Mosse; Tim Mills; Hisao Tajiri; C Paul Swain Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: S V Kantsevoy; B Hu; S B Jagannath; C A Vaughn; D M Beitler; S S C Chung; P B Cotton; C J Gostout; R H Hawes; P J Pasricha; C A Magee; L J Pipitone; M A Talamini; A N Kalloo Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2006-01-21 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Lee L Swanstrom; Richard Kozarek; Pankaj J Pasricha; Steven Gross; Desmond Birkett; Per-Ola Park; Vahid Saadat; Richard Ewers; Paul Swain Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Sanjay B Jagannath; Sergey V Kantsevoy; Cheryl A Vaughn; Sydney S C Chung; Peter B Cotton; Christopher J Gostout; Robert H Hawes; Pankaj J Pasricha; Diana G Scorpio; Carolyn A Magee; Laurie J Pipitone; Anthony N Kalloo Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Anders Meller Donatsky; Luise Andersen; Ole Lerberg Nielsen; Barbara Juliane Holzknecht; Peter Vilmann; Søren Meisner; Lars Nannestad Jørgensen; Jacob Rosenberg Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Maurício V Brun; Marco A M Silva; Mirandolino B Mariano; Adriana C Motta; Lucas M Colomé; João P S Feranti; Virgínia L Pohl; Michelli W Ataide; Rogério L Guedes; Fabiane R Santos Journal: Can Vet J Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 1.008
Authors: Peter Nau; E Christopher Ellison; Peter Muscarella; Dean Mikami; Vimal K Narula; Bradley Needleman; W Scott Melvin; Jeffrey W Hazey Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Steven E Hodgett; Jonathan M Hernandez; Connor A Morton; Sharona B Ross; Michael Albrink; Alexander S Rosemurgy Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-11-22 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Peter Nau; Joel Anderson; Benjamin Yuh; Peter Muscarella; E Christopher Ellison; Lynn Happel; Vimal K Narula; W Scott Melvin; Jeffrey W Hazey Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-01-07 Impact factor: 4.584