| Literature DB >> 18437226 |
Grazyna Deja1, Anna Myrda, Przemyslawa Jarosz-Chobot, Urszula Siekiera.
Abstract
This study aims to assess the autoimmunological status and forms of celiac disease (CD) among children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The study group comprises 27 patients at the mean age of 12.30 years (+/-SD 3.12). The measurement of the level of diabetes-specific antibodies and organ-specific antibodies was gained at the T1DM-onset and repeated annually. The following risk factors influencing time of CD diagnosis were analyzed: age, sex, T1DM duration, autoantibodies, and HLA-haplotype. The prevalence of antibodies was GADA-74%, IAA-63%, IA2A-67%, ATA-11%, and ATG-4%. The intestinal biopsy revealed in 19% no changes and in 77% stage 3 (Marsh scale). In most cases, no clinical manifestation of CD was observed. The diagnosis of Hashimoto's disease was made twice. The negative correlation between the age at T1DM-onset and the interval between onset of T1DM and CD (r = -0.35, p < .05) was noted. The high-comorbidity ratio of CD and thyroiditis with T1DM demands regular screening tests especially in the first years after T1DM-onset.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18437226 PMCID: PMC2323534 DOI: 10.1155/2008/285989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Figure 1Diabetes-associated autoantibodies in children at the time of T1DM onset.
Study group characteristics.
| Gender (female = 1) | Age at T1DM onset | GADA | IAA | IA2A | ATA | ATG | Biopsy | HLA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 11.5 | − | + | + | + | + | 3b | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗02 DRB1∗04 DQB1∗03 |
| 2 | 1 | 2.50 | + | + | + | − | − | 3b | DRB1 07 DQB1 02 DRB1∗04 DQB1∗03 |
| 3 | 1 | 5.50 | + | − | + | + | − | 3a | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗02 DRB1∗16 DQB1∗05 |
| 4 | 0 | 5.00 | − | + | − | − | − | 0 | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗02 DRB1∗04 DQB1∗03 |
| 5 | 0 | 10.00 | + | + | − | − | − | 1 | — |
| 6 | 1 | 5.50 | + | + | − | − | − | 0 | — |
| 7 | 0 | 2.50 | + | + | + | − | − | 3c | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗03 DRB1∗04 DQB1∗02 |
| 8 | 1 | 5.50 | − | + | + | − | − | 3a | DRB1 07 DQB1 03 DRB1 16 DQB1 06 |
| 9 | 1 | 7.00 | + | − | − | − | − | 3c | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗02 DRB1∗04 DQB1∗03 |
| 10 | 0 | 3.00 | + | + | + | − | − | 0 | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗02 DRB1∗04 DQB1∗03 |
| 11 | 1 | 2.00 | + | + | + | − | − | 3a | DRB1 01 DQB1 02 DRB1 16 DQB1 03 |
| 12 | 1 | 3.00 | − | − | + | − | − | 0 | — |
| 13 | 1 | 8.00 | + | + | − | − | − | 3c | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗03 DRB1∗04 DQB1∗02 |
| 14 | 0 | 1.50 | + | + | + | − | − | 3b | DRB1∗04-DQB1∗03 DRB1 07 DQB1 02 |
| 15 | 0 | 2.00 | − | + | − | − | − | 3c | DRB1∗03-DQB1∗02 DRB1 06 DQB1 05 |
| 16 | 1 | 2.50 | + | − | + | − | − | 0 | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗02 DRB1∗09 DQB1∗02 |
| 17 | 1 | 9.00 | − | − | − | − | − | 3b | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗02 DRB1∗04 DQB1∗03 |
| 18 | 0 | 5.00 | + | − | + | − | − | 3c | DRB1 01 DQB1 04 DRB1∗03 DQB1∗02 |
| 19 | 1 | 8.50 | + | − | + | + | − | 3b | DRB1∗011DQB1∗03 DRB1∗011DQB1∗02 |
| 20 | 0 | 10.00 | − | − | + | − | − | 3a | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗02 DRB1∗07 DQB1∗03 |
| 21 | 1 | 6.50 | + | + | + | − | − | 3c | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗02 DRB1∗13 DQB1∗03 |
| 22 | 1 | 2.50 | + | + | + | − | − | 3c | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗03 DRB1∗04 DQB1∗02 |
| 23 | 0 | 8.50 | + | − | + | − | − | 3a | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗03 DRB1∗04 DQB1∗02 |
| 24 | 0 | 11.00 | + | + | − | − | − | 3a | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗02 DRB1∗03 DQB1∗02 |
| 25 | 0 | 9.00 | + | + | + | − | − | 3c | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗02 DRB1∗03 DQB1∗02 |
| 26 | 0 | 8.50 | + | + | + | − | − | 3b | DRB1∗07 DQB1∗03 DRB1∗15 DQB1∗06 |
| 27 | 1 | 12.00 | + | − | − | − | − | 3c | DRB1∗03 DQB1∗03 DRB1∗04 DQB1∗02 |
Figure 2Negative correlation between age at T1DM-onset and the interval between onset of T1DM and CD (r = −0.35, p < .05).