Literature DB >> 18437142

Optimal cutoff point of waist circumference and use of home blood pressure as a definition of metabolic syndrome: the Ohasama study.

Atsushi Sato1, Kei Asayama, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Masahiro Kikuya, Taku Obara, Hirohito Metoki, Ryusuke Inoue, Azusa Hara, Haruhisa Hoshi, Junichiro Hashimoto, Kazuhito Totsune, Hiroshi Satoh, Yoshitomo Oka, Yutaka Imai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-measured blood pressure (BP) at home (HBP) has a stronger predictive power for cardiovascular mortality and morbidity than casual-screening BP (CBP). No studies have evaluated the clinical significance of self-measured HBP for diagnosing metabolic syndrome (MS). Eight scientific associations recently defined MS for the Japanese population. However, this definition remains controversial, especially with respect to the cutoff value of waist circumference (WC) being higher in women than in men.
METHODS: The: participants of this population-based survey were the 395 residents (> or =35 years of age) of Ohasama, a rural Japanese community. They measured HBP and underwent the oral glucose tolerance test between the years 2000 and 2006. We calculated the optimal cutoff values of WC required to diagnose MS, and examined the association of HBP with metabolic risk-factor clustering using multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Receiver operation characteristic analysis indicated that the optimal WC cutoff values for identifying clusters of metabolic risk factors were 87 and 80 cm in men and women, respectively. Elevated HBP was significantly associated with the clustering of metabolic risk factors but CBP was not.
CONCLUSION: The appropriate WC cutoff value in the current MS criteria for Japanese women would be 80 cm. We suggest that HBP would be useful when considering a diagnosis of MS. The association between MS determined using HBP and the prognosis of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) requires further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18437142     DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2007.88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  4 in total

1.  Metabolic risk factors and masked hypertension in the general population: the Finn-Home study.

Authors:  M-Ra Hänninen; T J Niiranen; P J Puukka; A M Jula
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Abdominal circumference should not be a required criterion for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Shibata; Sadao Suzuki; Juichi Sato; Isao Ohsawa; Shinichi Goto; Masaru Hashiguchi; Shinkan Tokudome
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.674

3.  Optimal cut-off point of waist circumference for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in Japanese subjects.

Authors:  Daisuke Ogawa; Kenji Kahara; Terunobu Shigematsu; Soichiro Fujii; Nobuhiko Hayakawa; Morihiro Okazaki; Hirofumi Makino
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 4.232

4.  Aging attenuates the association of central obesity with the accumulation of metabolic risk factors when assessed using the waist circumference measured at the umbilical level (the Japanese standard method).

Authors:  T Okazawa; M Iwata; Y Matsushita; Y Kamura; H Kato; S Okazawa; M Kigawa; K Tobe
Journal:  Nutr Diabetes       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.097

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.