Literature DB >> 18436888

Calling 911 in response to stroke: a nationwide study assessing definitive individual behavior.

Robert Mikulík1, Laura Bunt, Daniel Hrdlicka, Ladislav Dusek, Daniel Václavík, Jirí Kryza.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Stroke treatment is time-dependent, yet no study has systematically examined response to individual stroke symptoms in the general population. This nationwide study identifies which specific factors prompt correct response (calling 911) to stroke.
METHODS: Between November and December of 2005, a survey using a 3-stage random-sampling method including area, household, and household member sampling was conducted throughout the Czech Republic. Participants >40 years old were personally interviewed via a structured and standardized questionnaire concerning general knowledge and correct response to stroke as assessed by the Stroke Action Test (STAT). Predictors of scoring >50% on STAT were identified by multiple regression.
RESULTS: A total of 650 households were contacted, yielding 592 interviews (response rate 91%). Mean age was 58+/-12, 55% women. Sixty-nine percent thought stroke was serious condition, and 57% thought it could be treated. Also 54% correctly named >/=2 risk factors, and 46% named >/=2 warning signs. Eighteen percent of respondents scored >50% on STAT. The predictors of such a score were age (for each 10-year increment, OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.7), secondary school education (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.6), knowing that stroke is a serious disease (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.1), and knowing that stroke is treatable (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.2).
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge about stroke in the Czech Republic was fair, yet response to warning signs was poor. Our study is the first to identify that calling 911 was influenced by knowledge that stroke is a serious and treatable disease and not by recognition of symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18436888     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.499806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  20 in total

1.  Effect of a comprehensive health education program on pre-hospital delay intentions in high-risk stroke population and caregivers.

Authors:  Li Yang; Qiuli Zhao; Xuemei Zhu; Xiaoying Shen; Yulan Zhu; Liu Yang; Wei Gao; Minghui Li
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Stroke Ready Very Brief Intervention Improves Immediate Postintervention Stroke Preparedness.

Authors:  Maria Cielito Robles; Mellanie V Springer; Casey L Corches; James F Burke; Chun Chieh Lin; Alina Oliver; Lesli E Skolarus
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-11-26

Review 3.  Reducing prehospital delay in acute stroke.

Authors:  Miriam Bouckaert; Robin Lemmens; Vincent Thijs
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  Understanding reasons for delay in seeking acute stroke care in an underserved urban population.

Authors:  Amie W Hsia; Amanda Castle; Jeffrey J Wing; Dorothy F Edwards; Nina C Brown; Tara M Higgins; Jasmine L Wallace; Sara S Koslosky; M Chris Gibbons; Brisa N Sánchez; Ali Fokar; Nawar Shara; Lewis B Morgenstern; Chelsea S Kidwell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  A nationwide study on topography and efficacy of the stroke treatment network in the Czech republic.

Authors:  Robert Mikulík; Daniel Václavík; Daniel Sanák; Michal Bar; Pavel Sevcík; Zbynek Kalita; Nils Wahlgren
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Temporal trends in public awareness of stroke: warning signs, risk factors, and treatment.

Authors:  Dawn Kleindorfer; Jane Khoury; Joseph P Broderick; Eric Rademacher; Daniel Woo; Matthew L Flaherty; Kathleen Alwell; Charles J Moomaw; Alex Schneider; Arthur Pancioli; Rosie Miller; Brett M Kissela
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 7.  The chain of care enabling tPA treatment in acute ischemic stroke: a comprehensive review of organisational models.

Authors:  Maarten M H Lahr; Gert-Jan Luijckx; Patrick C A J Vroomen; Durk-Jouke van der Zee; Erik Buskens
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Stroke literacy in Central Harlem: a high-risk stroke population.

Authors:  Joshua Z Willey; Olajide Williams; Bernadette Boden-Albala
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Stroke knowledge in Italy.

Authors:  Marzia Baldereschi; Antonio Di Carlo; Concetta Vaccaro; Biancamaria Polizzi; Domenico Inzitari
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  Does stroke health promotion increase awareness of appropriate behavioural response? Impact of the face, arm, speech and time (FAST) campaign on population knowledge of stroke risk factors, warning signs and emergency response.

Authors:  Anne Hickey; Lisa Mellon; David Williams; Emer Shelley; Ronan M Conroy
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2018-01-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.