Literature DB >> 18436823

Comparison of HRT-3 glaucoma probability score and subjective stereophotograph assessment for prediction of progression in glaucoma.

Luciana M Alencar1, Christopher Bowd, Robert N Weinreb, Linda M Zangwill, Pamela A Sample, Felipe A Medeiros.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether baseline Glaucoma Probability Score (GPS; HRT-3; Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany) results are predictive of progression in patients with suspected glaucoma. The GPS is a new feature of the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope that generates an operator-independent, three-dimensional model of the optic nerve head and gives a score for the probability that this model is consistent with glaucomatous damage.
METHODS: The study included 223 patients with suspected glaucoma during an average follow-up of 63.3 months. Included subjects had a suspect optic disc appearance and/or elevated intraocular pressure, but normal visual fields. Conversion was defined as development of either repeatable abnormal visual fields or glaucomatous deterioration in the appearance of the optic disc during the study period. The association between baseline GPS and conversion was investigated by Cox regression models.
RESULTS: Fifty-four (24.2%) eyes converted. In multivariate models, both higher values of GPS global and subjective stereophotograph assessment (larger cup-disc ratio and glaucomatous grading) were predictive of conversion: adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI): 1.31 (1.15-1.50) per 0.1 higher global GPS, 1.34 (1.12-1.62) per 0.1 higher CDR, and 2.34 (1.22-4.47) for abnormal grading, respectively. No significant differences (P > 0.05 for all comparisons) were found between the c-index values (equivalent to area under ROC curve) for the multivariate models (0.732, 0.705, and 0.699, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: GPS values were predictive of conversion in our population of patients with suspected glaucoma. Further, they performed as well as subjective assessment of the optic disc. These results suggest that GPS could potentially replace stereophotograph as a tool for estimating the likelihood of conversion to glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18436823      PMCID: PMC2848163          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-0111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  22 in total

Review 1.  Laser scanning tomography to diagnose and monitor glaucoma.

Authors:  R N Weinreb
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.761

2.  Baseline topographic optic disc measurements are associated with the development of primary open-angle glaucoma: the Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Authors:  Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Julia A Beiser; Charles C Berry; George A Cioffi; Anne L Coleman; Gary Trick; Jeffrey M Liebmann; James D Brandt; Jody R Piltz-Seymour; Keri A Dirkes; Suzanne Vega; Michael A Kass; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09

3.  Glaucoma detection with the Heidelberg retina tomograph 3.

Authors:  Zvia Burgansky-Eliash; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. Reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  G A Cioffi; A L Robin; R D Eastman; H F Perell; F A Sarfarazi; S E Kelman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Initial glaucomatous optic disk and retinal nerve fiber layer abnormalities and their progression.

Authors:  A Tuulonen; P J Airaksinen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images.

Authors:  N V Swindale; G Stjepanovic; A Chin; F S Mikelberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Corneal thickness as a risk factor for visual field loss in patients with preperimetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Pamela A Sample; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Makoto Aihara; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  G Wollstein; D F Garway-Heath; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Medical treatment patterns of ASCRS members for primary open-angle glaucoma--1998 survey.

Authors:  B J Shingleton; A Crandall; M Johnstone; A Robin; R Brown
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Glaucoma care and conformance with preferred practice patterns. Examination of the private, community-based ophthalmologist.

Authors:  L H Hertzog; K G Albrecht; L LaBree; P P Lee
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  18 in total

1.  Glaucoma research community and FDA look to the future, II: NEI/FDA Glaucoma Clinical Trial Design and Endpoints Symposium: measures of structural change and visual function.

Authors:  Robert N Weinreb; Paul L Kaufman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  In vivo imaging methods to assess glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Brad Fortune
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  Predicting glaucomatous progression in glaucoma suspect eyes using relevance vector machine classifiers for combined structural and functional measurements.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Intae Lee; Michael H Goldbaum; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  A comparison of rates of change in neuroretinal rim area and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in progressive glaucoma.

Authors:  Luciana M Alencar; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher Bowd; Pamela A Sample; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Assessment of rates of structural change in glaucoma using imaging technologies.

Authors:  K Mansouri; M T Leite; F A Medeiros; C K Leung; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 6.  Clinical application of ocular imaging.

Authors:  Zach Nadler; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Evaluation of baseline structural factors for predicting glaucomatous visual-field progression using optical coherence tomography, scanning laser polarimetry and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  M Sehi; N Bhardwaj; Y S Chung; D S Greenfield
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 8.  [Value of Heidelberg retinal tomography in glaucoma diagnostics].

Authors:  E M Hoffmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Prediction of functional loss in glaucoma from progressive optic disc damage.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Luciana M Alencar; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10

Review 10.  Diagnostic tools for glaucoma detection and management.

Authors:  Pooja Sharma; Pamela A Sample; Linda M Zangwill; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.