PURPOSE: Beta-adrenergic receptor (AR) antagonists are frequently prescribed ophthalmic drugs, yet previous investigations into how catecholamines affect corneal wound healing have yielded conflicting RESULTS: With the use of an integrated pharmacologic and genetic approach, the authors investigated how the beta-AR impacts corneal epithelial healing. METHODS: Migratory rates of cultured adult murine corneal epithelial (AMCE) cells and in vivo corneal wound healing were examined in beta2-AR(+/+) and beta2-AR(-/-) mice. Signaling pathways were evaluated by immunoblotting. results. The beta-AR agonist isoproterenol decreased AMCE cell migratory speed to 70% of untreated controls, and this was correlated with a 0.60-fold decrease in levels of activated phospho-ERK (P-ERK). Treatment with the beta-AR antagonist (timolol) increased speed 33% and increased P-ERK 2.4-fold (P < 0.05). The same treatment protocols had no effect on AMCE cells derived from beta2-AR(-/-) mice; all treatment groups showed statistically equivalent migratory speeds and ERK phosphorylation. In beta2-AR(+/+) animals, the beta-AR agonist (isoproterenol) delayed the rate of in vivo corneal wound healing by 79%, whereas beta-AR antagonist (timolol) treatment increased the rate of healing by 16% (P < 0.05) compared with saline-treated controls. In contrast, in the beta2-AR(-/-) mice, all treatment groups demonstrated equivalent rates of wound healing. Additionally, murine corneal epithelial cell expressed the catecholamine-synthesizing enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase and detectable levels of epinephrine (184.5 pg/mg protein). CONCLUSIONS: The authors provide evidence of an endogenous autocrine catecholamine signaling pathway dependent on an intact beta2-AR for the modulation of corneal epithelial wound repair.
PURPOSE: Beta-adrenergic receptor (AR) antagonists are frequently prescribed ophthalmic drugs, yet previous investigations into how catecholamines affect corneal wound healing have yielded conflicting RESULTS: With the use of an integrated pharmacologic and genetic approach, the authors investigated how the beta-AR impacts corneal epithelial healing. METHODS: Migratory rates of cultured adult murine corneal epithelial (AMCE) cells and in vivo corneal wound healing were examined in beta2-AR(+/+) and beta2-AR(-/-) mice. Signaling pathways were evaluated by immunoblotting. results. The beta-AR agonist isoproterenol decreased AMCE cell migratory speed to 70% of untreated controls, and this was correlated with a 0.60-fold decrease in levels of activated phospho-ERK (P-ERK). Treatment with the beta-AR antagonist (timolol) increased speed 33% and increased P-ERK 2.4-fold (P < 0.05). The same treatment protocols had no effect on AMCE cells derived from beta2-AR(-/-) mice; all treatment groups showed statistically equivalent migratory speeds and ERK phosphorylation. In beta2-AR(+/+) animals, the beta-AR agonist (isoproterenol) delayed the rate of in vivo corneal wound healing by 79%, whereas beta-AR antagonist (timolol) treatment increased the rate of healing by 16% (P < 0.05) compared with saline-treated controls. In contrast, in the beta2-AR(-/-) mice, all treatment groups demonstrated equivalent rates of wound healing. Additionally, murine corneal epithelial cell expressed the catecholamine-synthesizing enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase and detectable levels of epinephrine (184.5 pg/mg protein). CONCLUSIONS: The authors provide evidence of an endogenous autocrine catecholamine signaling pathway dependent on an intact beta2-AR for the modulation of corneal epithelial wound repair.
Authors: Christine E Pullar; Min Zhao; Bing Song; Jin Pu; Brian Reid; Shahed Ghoghawala; Colin McCaig; R Rivkah Isseroff Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Raja K Sivamani; Biao Shi; Elizabeth Griffiths; Shirley M Vu; Hadar A Lev-Tov; Sara Dahle; Marianne Chigbrow; Thi Dinh La; Chelcy Mashburn; Thomas R Peavy; R Rivkah Isseroff Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Andrzej T Slominski; Michal A Zmijewski; Cezary Skobowiat; Blazej Zbytek; Radomir M Slominski; Jeffery D Steketee Journal: Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol Date: 2012 Impact factor: 1.231
Authors: Elizabeth R Peitzman; Nathan A Zaidman; Peter J Maniak; Scott M O'Grady Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2015-10-21 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Alexey Pronin; Konstantin Levay; Dmitry Velmeshev; Mohammad Faghihi; Valery I Shestopalov; Vladlen Z Slepak Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Raja K Sivamani; Christine E Pullar; Catherine G Manabat-Hidalgo; David M Rocke; Richard C Carlsen; David G Greenhalgh; R Rivkah Isseroff Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-01-13 Impact factor: 11.069