Literature DB >> 18436523

Modulation of ER phosphorylation on serine 118 by endocrine therapy: a new surrogate marker for efficacy.

M Zoubir1, M C Mathieu2, C Mazouni3, C Liedtke4, L Corley5, S Geha2, J Bouaziz6, M Spielmann7, F Drusche2, W F Symmans8, S Delaloge1, F Andre9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phosphorylation of serine 118 (ser118) has been reported to be involved in the activation of estrogen receptor (ER). In the present study, we evaluated whether endocrine therapy modulated ER phosphorylation on ser118. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a tissue microarray that included 80 primary breast tumors obtained before the administration of endocrine therapy. A second tissue microarray included 52 tumors obtained after endocrine therapy from the same patients. Immunostainings were carried out for ER, Pser118ER, Her2, insulin growth factor receptor (IGFR), p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1), pMAPK, bcl2 and progesterone receptor.
RESULTS: Pser118ER staining was higher in Her2- (P = 0.06), IGFR- (P = 0.0002) and pMAPK-expressing tumors (P = 0.001). The level of ER phosphorylation was not different according to the occurrence of clinical tumor response (P = 0.16). Pser118ER expression was significantly reduced by endocrine therapy. The mean Pser118ER score was 163 [standard deviation (SD) 81] before endocrine therapy and 80 (SD 90) after endocrine therapy (P = 0.0001, paired t-test). The magnitude of Pser118ER decrease was higher in tumors that responded to endocrine therapy (mean decrease 128, SD 86) as compared with refractory tumors (mean decrease 38, SD 130) (P = 0.017, t-test).
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that endocrine therapy modulates ER on ser118. Pser118ER immunostaining could be used as surrogate marker to monitor treatment efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18436523     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  8 in total

1.  The cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript mediates ligand-independent activation of ERα, and is an independent prognostic factor in node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  D J Brennan; D P O'Connor; H Laursen; S F McGee; S McCarthy; R Zagozdzon; E Rexhepaj; A C Culhane; F M Martin; M J Duffy; G Landberg; L Ryden; S M Hewitt; M J Kuhar; R Bernards; R C Millikan; J P Crown; K Jirström; W M Gallagher
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 2.  Structural and functional characterization of aromatase, estrogen receptor, and their genes in endocrine-responsive and -resistant breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Hei Jason Chan; Karineh Petrossian; Shiuan Chen
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.292

3.  MicroRNA-34a suppresses cell proliferation by targeting LMTK3 in human breast cancer mcf-7 cell line.

Authors:  Guoqing Zhao; Jun Guo; Dong Li; Chengyou Jia; Wanzhong Yin; Ran Sun; Zhongwei Lv; Xianling Cong
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.311

Review 4.  Neoadjuvant Trials in ER+ Breast Cancer: A Tool for Acceleration of Drug Development and Discovery.

Authors:  Angel L Guerrero-Zotano; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 39.397

5.  Wnt-5a signaling restores tamoxifen sensitivity in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Caroline E Ford; Elin J Ekström; Tommy Andersson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Immunohistochemical validation of multiple phospho-specific epitopes for estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) in tissue microarrays of ERalpha positive human breast carcinomas.

Authors:  George P Skliris; Brian G Rowan; Mariam Al-Dhaheri; Christopher Williams; Sandy Troup; Sanela Begic; Michelle Parisien; Peter H Watson; Leigh C Murphy
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Gαo potentiates estrogen receptor α activity via the ERK signaling pathway.

Authors:  Melyssa R Bratton; James W Antoon; Bich N Duong; Daniel E Frigo; Syreeta Tilghman; Bridgette M Collins-Burow; Steven Elliott; Yan Tang; Lilia I Melnik; Ling Lai; Jawed Alam; Barbara S Beckman; Steven M Hill; Brian G Rowan; John A McLachlan; Matthew E Burow
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.286

Review 8.  The potential of hypoxia markers as target for breast molecular imaging--a systematic review and meta-analysis of human marker expression.

Authors:  Arthur Adams; Aram S A van Brussel; Jeroen F Vermeulen; Willem P Th M Mali; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest; Sjoerd G Elias
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.