Literature DB >> 18436277

Biopsy histomorphometry predicts uterine myoinvasion by endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

George L Mutter1, James Kauderer, Jan P A Baak, David Alberts.   

Abstract

A barrier to nonsurgical management of premalignant endometrial disease is the need to perform hysterectomy to exclude concurrent myoinvasive endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Occult adenocarcinoma rates for premalignant disease diagnosed by biopsy or curettage are approximately 40%. We applied the histomorphometric 4-class rule ("4C," which measures epithelial abundance, thickness, and nuclear variation) to diagnostic biopsies to predict myoinvasive cancer outcomes at hysterectomy. Women with endometrial biopsies or curettages having a community diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia were enrolled in a clinical trial in which subsequent hysterectomy was scored for endometrial adenocarcinoma, and 4C rule ability to predict cancer outcomes was measured. Qualifying biopsies were stratified into high- and low-risk histomorphometric subgroups. Two-hundred thirty-three women had biopsies suited to morphometry and scorable hysterectomy outcomes, of which 46% contained adenocarcinoma. Assignment to a high-risk category by the 4C rule was highly sensitive in predicting any (71%) or deeply (92%) myoinvasive adenocarcinoma at hysterectomy, and assignment to a low-risk group had a high negative predictive value for absence of any (90%) or deeply (99%) myoinvasive disease. Volume percentage epithelium was associated with myoinvasive cancer outcomes above a threshold of 50% (P < .001), and a measure of nuclear pleomorphism was significantly increased (P = .004) in deeply myoinvasive cancers. Formal histomorphometry of endometrial biopsies using the 4C rule has been validated as a means to identify a subset of women with premalignant disease who are unlikely to have concurrent myoinvasive adenocarcinoma and who may qualify for alternative nonsurgical therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18436277      PMCID: PMC2601480          DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  14 in total

1.  Reproducibility of the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Richard J Zaino; James Kauderer; Cornelia Liu Trimble; Steven G Silverberg; John P Curtin; Peter C Lim; Donald G Gallup
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Intratumoral genetic heterogeneity and progression of endometrioid type endometrial adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  W C Faquin; J T Fitzgerald; K A Boynton; G L Mutter
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Prediction of endometrial carcinoma by subjective endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis.

Authors:  Jonathan L Hecht; Tan A Ince; Jan P A Baak; Heather E Baker; Maryann W Ogden; George L Mutter
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Cornelia L Trimble; James Kauderer; Richard Zaino; Steven Silverberg; Peter C Lim; James J Burke; David Alberts; John Curtin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  The molecular genetics and morphometry-based endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classification system predicts disease progression in endometrial hyperplasia more accurately than the 1994 World Health Organization classification system.

Authors:  Jan P Baak; George L Mutter; Stanley Robboy; Paul J van Diest; Anne M Uyterlinde; Anne Orbo; Juan Palazzo; Bent Fiane; Kjell Løvslett; Curt Burger; Feja Voorhorst; René H Verheijen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Intrauterine progesterone treatment of early endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Fredrick J Montz; Robert E Bristow; Alessandro Bovicelli; Rafael Tomacruz; Robert J Kurman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Precancer: a conceptual working definition -- results of a Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Jules J Berman; Jorge Albores-Saavedra; David Bostwick; Ronald Delellis; John Eble; Stanley R Hamilton; Ralph H Hruban; George L Mutter; David Page; Thomas Rohan; William Travis; Donald E Henson
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2006-10-31

8.  The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of "untreated" hyperplasia in 170 patients.

Authors:  R J Kurman; P F Kaminski; H J Norris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Quantitative, microscopical, computer-aided diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma in individual patients.

Authors:  J P Baak; P H Kurver; S H Overdiep; J F Delemarre; M E Boon; J Lindeman; P C Diegenbach
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Computer-aided application of quantitative microscopy in diagnostic pathology.

Authors:  J P Baak; P H Kurver; M E Boon
Journal:  Pathol Annu       Date:  1982
View more
  10 in total

1.  Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with polyps and frequently has metaplastic change.

Authors:  J W Carlson; G L Mutter
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Emergence, involution, and progression to carcinoma of mutant clones in normal endometrial tissues.

Authors:  George L Mutter; Nicolas M Monte; Donna Neuberg; Alex Ferenczy; Charis Eng
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Karyometry in atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Peter H Bartels; Francisco A R Garcia; Cornelia L Trimble; James Kauderer; John Curtin; Peter C Lim; Lisa M Hess; Steven Silverberg; Richard J Zaino; Michael Yozwiak; Hubert G Bartels; David S Alberts
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: clinical correlates and outcomes.

Authors:  Luwam G Semere; Emily Ko; Natasha R Johnson; Allison F Vitonis; Laura J Phang; Daniel W Cramer; George L Mutter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Multimodal MRI-Based Radiomics-Clinical Model for Preoperatively Differentiating Concurrent Endometrial Carcinoma From Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Jieying Zhang; Qi Zhang; Tingting Wang; Yan Song; Xiaoduo Yu; Lizhi Xie; Yan Chen; Han Ouyang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Management of endometrial precancers.

Authors:  Cornelia L Trimble; Michael Method; Mario Leitao; Karen Lu; Olga Ioffe; Moss Hampton; Robert Higgins; Richard Zaino; George L Mutter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Involution of latent endometrial precancers by hormonal and nonhormonal mechanisms.

Authors:  Ming-Chieh Lin; Kyla A Burkholder; Akila N Viswanathan; Donna Neuberg; George L Mutter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  New classification system of endometrial hyperplasia WHO 2014 and its clinical implications.

Authors:  Katarzyna Sobczuk; Anna Sobczuk
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2017-10-12

Review 9.  New concepts for an old problem: the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia.

Authors:  Peter A Sanderson; Hilary O D Critchley; Alistair R W Williams; Mark J Arends; Philippa T K Saunders
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Concurrent and future risk of endometrial cancer in women with endometrial hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michelle T Doherty; Omolara B Sanni; Helen G Coleman; Chris R Cardwell; W Glenn McCluggage; Declan Quinn; James Wylie; Úna C McMenamin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.