Literature DB >> 18436182

Sublingual hyoscyamine spray as premedication for colonoscopy: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.

Louis A Chaptini1, Eileen M Janec, Gregory Seltzer, Steven Peikin, Adam B Elfant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonic motility and spasm during colonoscopy may affect duration and quality of the examination as well as patient comfort during and after the procedure. Previous studies assessing the utility of antispasmodic agents in colonoscopy demonstrated conflicting results. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of sublingual hyoscyamine spray (IB-Stat, Inkine Pharmaceutical) on the performance of colonoscopy.
METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomized in a double-blind study to receive .25 mg sublingual hyoscyamine spray (n = 50: 25 men and 25 women, mean age 60) or placebo spray (n = 50: 23 men and 27 women, mean age 56) 15 to 30 minutes before the procedure. Parameters measured included time required to reach the cecum, total procedure time, endoscopist perception of colonic motility and difficulty of the procedure, and patient assessment of discomfort after the procedure. The latter parameters were measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale. A single endoscopist performed all of the procedures.
RESULTS: After adjustment for age, procedural difficulty scores and colonic motility scores were significantly lower in the hyoscyamine group compared with placebo (differences of 5.589 mm [P = .047] and 5.685 mm [P = .040], respectively). Mean time to cecal intubation and percentage of patients with discomfort were slightly lower in the hyoscyamine group (5.68 minutes/48%) compared with placebo (5.92 minutes/57.1%), although the differences were not statistically significant (P = .57 and P = .36, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Procedural difficulty and colonic motility scores were significantly lower in subjects who received sublingual hyoscyamine before colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18436182     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  4 in total

Review 1.  Antispasmodic drugs in colonoscopy: a review of their pharmacology, safety and efficacy in improving polyp detection and related outcomes.

Authors:  Santosh Sanagapalli; Kriti Agnihotri; Rupert Leong; Crispin John Corte
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 2.  Does hyoscine butylbromide really improve polyp detection during colonoscopy? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Pei-Jing Cui; Jing Yao; Hua-Zhong Han; Yi-Jun Zhao; Jun Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; Roisin Bevan; Katharina Zimmermann-Fraedrich; Matthew D Rutter; Douglas Rex; Evelien Dekker; Thierry Ponchon; Michael Bretthauer; Jaroslaw Regula; Brian Saunders; Cesare Hassan; Michael J Bourke; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Improvement of Quality of Nonanesthetic Colonoscopy by Preoperative Administration of Pinaverium Bromide.

Authors:  Xiao-Lin Wang; Jian-Ning Zhou; Li Ren; Xiao-Li Pan; Hong-Yu Ren; Jun Liu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.