Literature DB >> 18435865

Cognitive and social processes predicting partner psychological adaptation to early stage breast cancer.

Sharon Manne1, Jamie Ostroff, Kevin Fox, Generosa Grana, Gary Winkel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis and subsequent treatment for early stage breast cancer is stressful for partners. Little is known about the role of cognitive and social processes predicting the longitudinal course of partners' psychosocial adaptation. This study evaluated the role of cognitive and social processing in partner psychological adaptation to early stage breast cancer, evaluating both main and moderator effect models. Moderating effects for meaning making, acceptance, and positive reappraisal on the predictive association of searching for meaning, emotional processing, and emotional expression on partner psychological distress were examined.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Partners of women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer were evaluated shortly after the ill partner's diagnosis (N=253), 9 (N=167), and 18 months (N=149) later. Partners completed measures of emotional expression, emotional processing, acceptance, meaning making, and general and cancer-specific distress at all time points.
RESULTS: Lower satisfaction with partner support predicted greater global distress, and greater use of positive reappraisal was associated with greater distress. The predicted moderator effects for found meaning on the associations between the search for meaning and cancer-specific distress were found and similar moderating effects for positive reappraisal on the associations between emotional expression and global distress and for acceptance on the association between emotional processing and cancer-specific distress were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate several cognitive-social processes directly predict partner distress. However, moderator effect models in which the effects of partners' processing depends upon whether these efforts result in changes in perceptions of the cancer experience may add to the understanding of partners' adaptation to cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18435865      PMCID: PMC2684810          DOI: 10.1348/135910708X298458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-107X


  32 in total

1.  Psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer over 4 years: identifying distinct trajectories of change.

Authors:  Vicki S Helgeson; Pamela Snyder; Howard Seltman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Social support in patients' and husbands' adjustment to breast cancer.

Authors:  L L Northouse
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Health status and the use of outpatient mental health services.

Authors:  J E Ware; W G Manning; N Duan; K B Wells; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1984-10

4.  The psychological impact of cancer.

Authors:  P Maguire
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1985-08

5.  Psychosocial adjustment among husbands of women treated for breast cancer; mastectomy vs. breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  M Omne-Pontén; L Holmberg; R Bergström; P O Sjödén; T Burns
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: a study of women with early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  C S Carver; C Pozo; S D Harris; V Noriega; M F Scheier; D S Robinson; A S Ketcham; F L Moffat; K C Clark
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1993-08

7.  Is finding something good in the bad always good? Benefit finding among women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Patricia L Tomich; Vicki S Helgeson
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Posttraumatic growth after breast cancer: patient, partner, and couple perspectives.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Jamie Ostroff; Gary Winkel; Lori Goldstein; Kevin Fox; Generosa Grana
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

9.  Couples' support-related communication, psychological distress, and relationship satisfaction among women with early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Marne Sherman; Stephanie Ross; Jamie Ostroff; Richard E Heyman; Kevin Fox
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2004-08

10.  Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress.

Authors:  M Horowitz; N Wilner; W Alvarez
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.312

View more
  6 in total

1.  A pilot, multisite, randomized controlled trial of a self-directed coping skills training intervention for couples facing prostate cancer: accrual, retention, and data collection issues.

Authors:  Sylvie D Lambert; Patrick McElduff; Afaf Girgis; Janelle V Levesque; Tim W Regan; Jane Turner; Hayley Candler; Cathrine Mihalopoulos; Sophy T F Shih; Karen Kayser; Peter Chong
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Depressive symptom trajectories in women affected by breast cancer and their male partners: a nationwide prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nina Rottmann; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Mariët Hagedoorn; Pia Veldt Larsen; Anne Nicolaisen; Pernille Envold Bidstrup; Hanne Würtzen; Henrik Flyger; Niels Kroman; Christoffer Johansen
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Cancer conversations in context: naturalistic observation of couples coping with breast cancer.

Authors:  Megan L Robbins; Ana María López; Karen L Weihs; Matthias R Mehl
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2014-04-14

4.  A feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial of the Positive Reappraisal Coping Intervention, a novel supportive technique for recurrent miscarriage.

Authors:  Sarah Bailey; Chris Bailey; Jacky Boivin; Ying Cheong; Isabel Reading; Nick Macklon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy.

Authors:  Sarah Louise Bailey; Jacky Boivin; Ying C Cheong; Ellen Kitson-Reynolds; Christopher Bailey; Nick Macklon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The Meaning Making Model Applied to Community-Dwelling Adults with Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Alexandra Ferreira-Valente; Fernando Fontes; José Pais-Ribeiro; Mark P Jensen
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.133

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.