Literature DB >> 18435669

Glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in seven European countries: findings from the Real-Life Effectiveness and Care Patterns of Diabetes Management (RECAP-DM) study.

F Alvarez Guisasola1, P Mavros, G Nocea, E Alemao, C M Alexander, D Yin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess glycaemic control as well as changes in glycaemic control over time in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who added a sulphonylurea (SU) or thiazolidinedione (TZD) to their metformin monotherapy in typical treatment settings within seven European countries.
METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional multicentre study with retrospective medical chart review was conducted in Finland, France, Germany, Norway, Poland, Spain and UK. T2DM patients who added a SU or a TZD to metformin monotherapy between January 2001 and January 2006 (i.e. index date) and who had > or = 1 haemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) measurement within 12 months before the visit date, which occurred from June 2006 to February 2007, were included in the study. Demographic and clinical data were collected from medical records. The main study outcome measure was the proportion of patients with adequate glycaemic control (defined according to the International Diabetes Federation as HbA1C < 6.5%) using the most recent HbA1C measurement before the visit date. In addition, patients were grouped based upon the interval from the index date to the most recent HbA1C measurement to evaluate goal attainment and treatment changes over time.
FINDINGS: In this European cohort of 2023 T2DM patients on metformin and either an SU or a TZD (mean age = 60.4 years), 25.5% of patients had adequate glycaemic control. The average HbA1C level was 7.2% after a mean of 2.6 years of treatment with combination oral antihyperglycaemic agent (AHA) therapy. Among the patients (n = 227) with most recent HbA1C measurement within 1 year after first adding an SU or a TZD, 27% had adequate glycaemic control (HbA1C < 6.5%), with a mean (s.d.) HbA1C of 7.1% (1.0); 1.3% of these patients were using some type of insulin therapy. Among the patients (n = 176) with most recent HbA1C measurement occurring > or = 5 years after adding an SU or a TZD, 20% had adequate glycaemic control, with a mean (s.d.) HbA1C of 7.4% (1.17), and 29.6% of these patients were using insulin. Overall, patients with (vs. without) adequate glycaemic control had significantly (p < 0.05) lower HbA1C levels (7.6 vs. 8.2%) at the time of adding an SU or a TZD to ongoing metformin monotherapy, were less likely to report a history of macrovascular complications (20 vs. 26%) and were more often engaged in physical activity three to five times a week (29 vs. 23%).
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one quarter of European out-patients with T2DM had adequate glycaemic control after a mean of 2.6 years following initiation of combination AHA therapy. Overall glycaemic control modestly declined over time, even though more patients were being treated with insulin. These findings highlight the progressive nature of the disease and need for more effective disease management/therapeutic alternatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18435669     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00881.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab        ISSN: 1462-8902            Impact factor:   6.577


  27 in total

1.  Inadequate control of diabetes and metabolic indices among diabetic patients: A population based study from the Kerman Coronary Artery Disease Risk Study (KERCADRS).

Authors:  Gholamreza Yousefzadeh; Mostafa Shokoohi; Hamid Najafipour
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-12-23

2.  Renal Function in Type 2 Diabetes Following Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Adrian T Billeter; Stefan Kopf; Martin Zeier; Katharina Scheurlen; Lars Fischer; Thilo M Schulte; Hannes G Kenngott; Barbara Israel; Philipp Knefeli; Markus W Büchler; Peter P Nawroth; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Glycaemic control, treatment satisfaction and quality of life in type 2 diabetes patients in Greece: The PANORAMA study Greek results.

Authors:  Iraklis Avramopoulos; Alexandros Moulis; Nikos Nikas
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-02-15

4.  Frequency of glycated hemoglobin monitoring was inversely associated with glycemic control of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  C Fu; L Ji; W Wang; R Luan; W Chen; S Zhan; B Xu
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Clinical inertia in patients with T2DM requiring insulin in family practice.

Authors:  Stewart B Harris; Jovana Kapor; Cynthia N Lank; Andrew R Willan; Tricia Houston
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Time to Insulin Initiation in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in 2010/2011 and 2016/2017 in Germany.

Authors:  Karel Kostev; Stefan Gölz; Bernd-M Scholz; Marcel Kaiser; Stefan Pscherer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-12

7.  Pre-existing cardiovascular diseases and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Europe: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Alex Z Fu; Ying Qiu; Larry Radican; Donald D Yin; Panagiotis Mavros
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 9.951

8.  Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Are Willing to Do More to Overcome Therapeutic Inertia: Results From a Double-Blind Survey.

Authors:  Steven V Edelman; Richard Wood; Michelle Roberts; Jay H Shubrook
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2020-07

Review 9.  Glycemic Control among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Countries of Arabic Gulf.

Authors:  Ahmad Ali Al-Rasheedi
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2015-07

10.  Glycemic control and diabetes-related health care costs in type 2 diabetes; retrospective analysis based on clinical and administrative databases.

Authors:  Luca Degli Esposti; Stefania Saragoni; Stefano Buda; Alessandra Sturani; Ezio Degli Esposti
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.