Literature DB >> 18435629

Experience with over 1000 implanted ventricular assist devices.

Evgenij V Potapov1, Antonio Loforte, Yuguo Weng, Michael Jurmann, Miralem Pasic, Thorsten Drews, Matthias Loebe, Ewald Hennig, Thomas Krabatsch, Andreas Koster, Hans B Lehmkuhl, Roland Hetzer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of ventricular assist devices (VADs) in patients with chronic end-stage or acute heart failure has led to improved survival. We present our experience since 1987. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between July 1987 and December 2006, 1026 VADs were implanted in 970 patients. Most of them were men (81.9%). The indications were: cardiomyopathy (n = 708), postcardiotomy heart failure (n = 173), acute myocardial infarction (n = 36), acute graft failure (n = 45), a VAD problem (n = 6), and others (n = 2). Mean age was 46.1 (range 3 days to 78) years. In 50.5% of the patients the VAD implanted was left ventricular, in 47.9% biventricular, and in 1.5% right ventricular. There were 14 different types of VAD. A total artificial heart was implanted in 14 patients.
RESULTS: Survival analysis showed higher early mortality (p < 0.05) in the postcardiotomy group (50.9%) than in patients with preoperative profound cardiogenic shock (31.1%) and patients with preoperative end-stage heart failure without severe shock (28.9%). A total of 270 patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation (HTx). There were no significant differences in long-term survival after HTx among patients with and without previous VAD. In 76 patients the device could be explanted after myocardial recovery. In 72 patients the aim of implantation was permanent support. During the study period 114 patients were discharged home. Currently, 54 patients are on a device.
CONCLUSIONS: VAD implantation may lead to recovery from secondary organ failure. Patients should be considered for VAD implantation before profound, possibly irreversible, cardiogenic shock occurs. In patients with postcardiotomy heart failure, a more efficient algorithm should be developed to improve survival. With increased experience, more VAD patients can participate in out-patient programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18435629     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2008.00606.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Surg        ISSN: 0886-0440            Impact factor:   1.620


  14 in total

1.  Ventricular assist devices: initial orientation.

Authors:  Martin Schweiger; Hitendu Dave; Frithjof Lemme; Olga Romanchenko; Michael Hofmann; Michael Hübler
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The future of adult cardiac assist devices: novel systems and mechanical circulatory support strategies.

Authors:  Carlo R Bartoli; Robert D Dowling
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.213

3.  Left ventricular remodeling and myocardial recovery on mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Marc A Simon; Brian A Primack; Jeffrey Teuteberg; Robert L Kormos; Christian Bermudez; Yoshiya Toyoda; Hemal Shah; John Gorcsan; Dennis M McNamara
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.712

4.  Thirty-day in-vivo performance of a wearable artificial pump-lung for ambulatory respiratory support.

Authors:  Zhongjun J Wu; Tao Zhang; Giacomo Bianchi; Xufeng Wei; Ho-Sung Son; Kang Zhou; Pablo G Sanchez; Jose Garcia; Bartley P Griffith
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  Right Ventricular Strain to Assess Early Right Heart Failure in the Left Ventricular Assist Device Candidate.

Authors:  Fatih Gumus; Cahit Sarıcaoglu; Mustafa Bahadir Inan; Ahmet Ruchan Akar
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2019-12

6.  Temporary percutaneous right ventricular support using a centrifugal pump in patients with postoperative acute refractory right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Assad Haneya; Alois Philipp; Thomas Puehler; Leopold Rupprecht; Reinhard Kobuch; Michael Hilker; Christof Schmid; Stephan W Hirt
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 7.  Contemporary mechanical circulatory support therapy for postcardiotomy shock.

Authors:  Shinichi Fukuhara; Koji Takeda; Arthur Reshad Garan; Paul Kurlansky; Jonathan Hastie; Yoshifumi Naka; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-02-13

8.  Risk score derived from pre-operative data analysis predicts the need for biventricular mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  J Raymond Fitzpatrick; John R Frederick; Vivian M Hsu; Elliott D Kozin; Mary Lou O'Hara; Elan Howell; Deborah Dougherty; Ryan C McCormick; Carine A Laporte; Jeffrey E Cohen; Kevin W Southerland; Jessica L Howard; Mariell L Jessup; Rohinton J Morris; Michael A Acker; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Early planned institution of biventricular mechanical circulatory support results in improved outcomes compared with delayed conversion of a left ventricular assist device to a biventricular assist device.

Authors:  J Raymond Fitzpatrick; John R Frederick; William Hiesinger; Vivian M Hsu; Ryan C McCormick; Elliott D Kozin; Carine M Laporte; Mary Lou O'Hara; Elan Howell; Deborah Dougherty; Jeffrey E Cohen; Kevin W Southerland; Jessica L Howard; E Carter Paulson; Michael A Acker; Rohinton J Morris; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 10.  The current status of heart transplantation and the development of "artificial heart systems".

Authors:  Martin Strüber; Anna L Meyer; Doris Malehsa; Christiane Kugler; Andre R Simon; Axel Haverich
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.