INTRODUCTION: Study of mutations with large phenotypic effects has allowed the identification of key players in skeletal development. However, the molecular nature of variation in large, phenotypically normal populations tends to be characterized by smaller phenotypic effects that remain undefined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We use interval mapping and quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping techniques in the combined F2-F3 populations (n = 2111) of an LG/J x SM/J mouse intercross to detect QTLs associated with the lengths of the humerus, ulna, femur, and tibia. RESULTS: Seventy individual trait QTLs affecting long bone lengths were detected, with several chromosomes harboring multiple QTLs. The genetic architecture suggests mainly small, additive effects on long bone length, with roughly one third of the QTLs displaying dominance. Sex interactions were common, and four sex-specific QTLs were observed. Pleiotropy could not be rejected for most of the QTLs identified. Thirty-one epistatic interactions were detected, almost all affecting regions including or immediately adjacent to QTLs. CONCLUSIONS: A complex regulatory network with many gene interactions modulates bone growth, possibly with integrated skeletal modules that allow fine-tuning of developmental processes present. Candidate genes in the QTL CIs include many genes known to affect endochondral bone growth and genes that have not yet been associated with bone growth or body size but have a strong potential to influence these traits.
INTRODUCTION: Study of mutations with large phenotypic effects has allowed the identification of key players in skeletal development. However, the molecular nature of variation in large, phenotypically normal populations tends to be characterized by smaller phenotypic effects that remain undefined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We use interval mapping and quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping techniques in the combined F2-F3 populations (n = 2111) of an LG/J x SM/J mouse intercross to detect QTLs associated with the lengths of the humerus, ulna, femur, and tibia. RESULTS: Seventy individual trait QTLs affecting long bone lengths were detected, with several chromosomes harboring multiple QTLs. The genetic architecture suggests mainly small, additive effects on long bone length, with roughly one third of the QTLs displaying dominance. Sex interactions were common, and four sex-specific QTLs were observed. Pleiotropy could not be rejected for most of the QTLs identified. Thirty-one epistatic interactions were detected, almost all affecting regions including or immediately adjacent to QTLs. CONCLUSIONS: A complex regulatory network with many gene interactions modulates bone growth, possibly with integrated skeletal modules that allow fine-tuning of developmental processes present. Candidate genes in the QTL CIs include many genes known to affect endochondral bone growth and genes that have not yet been associated with bone growth or body size but have a strong potential to influence these traits.
Authors: Chandrasekhar Kesavan; Subburaman Mohan; Apurva K Srivastava; Susanna Kapoor; Jon E Wergedal; Hongrun Yu; David J Baylink Journal: Bone Date: 2006-05-18 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: J M Cheverud; T T Vaughn; L S Pletscher; A C Peripato; E S Adams; C F Erikson; K J King-Ellison Journal: Mamm Genome Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 2.957
Authors: Charles R Farber; Scott A Kelly; Ethan Baruch; Daniel Yu; Kunjie Hua; Derrick L Nehrenberg; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Ryan J Buus; Theodore Garland; Daniel Pomp Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Muhammad Farooq Rai; Shingo Hashimoto; Eric E Johnson; Kara L Janiszak; Jamie Fitzgerald; Ellen Heber-Katz; James M Cheverud; Linda J Sandell Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2012-07
Authors: James M Cheverud; Gloria L Fawcett; Joseph P Jarvis; Elizabeth A Norgard; Mihaela Pavlicev; L Susan Pletscher; Kenneth S Polonsky; Honggang Ye; Graeme I Bell; Clay F Semenkovich Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Katherine E Willmore; Charles C Roseman; Jeffrey Rogers; James M Cheverud; Joan T Richtsmeier Journal: Evol Biol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 3.119
Authors: Michelle D Parmenter; Melissa M Gray; Caley A Hogan; Irene N Ford; Karl W Broman; Christopher J Vinyard; Bret A Payseur Journal: Genetics Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 4.562