OBJECTIVES: In the Russian Federation, large sectors of the population regularly undergo mandatory occupational screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Objectives of our study were to determine the prevalence of syphilis and gonorrhea in the screened occupational groups in Moscow and to conduct a cost-effectiveness evaluation of the occupational screening program. STUDY DESIGN: Serum samples from 4 main occupational groups (food handlers and other food industry workers, market salespersons, education and health care providers, and hotel and other public utility workers) were tested for syphilis and gonorrhea. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis (in 2003 rubles) of the screening program using decision analysis models. RESULTS: In the total sample of 1000 study participants, overall prevalence for syphilis was 1.2% with the highest rate in market salespersons (4.4%) and for gonorrhea 0.3%. The incremental cost per case of STI treated was 8409 rubles ($252) for syphilis screening (compared with no screening) with higher incremental costs associated with expanding the program to include gonorrhea screening. The relatively low STI prevalence in the screened groups and the poor performance of the diagnostic tests used were important factors in the estimated cost-effectiveness of occupation-based screening. CONCLUSIONS: Modifications to occupation-based screening, including an increased focus on higher risk population and the adoption of more current diagnostic technologies, could help to use prevention resources more effectively.
OBJECTIVES: In the Russian Federation, large sectors of the population regularly undergo mandatory occupational screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Objectives of our study were to determine the prevalence of syphilis and gonorrhea in the screened occupational groups in Moscow and to conduct a cost-effectiveness evaluation of the occupational screening program. STUDY DESIGN: Serum samples from 4 main occupational groups (food handlers and other food industry workers, market salespersons, education and health care providers, and hotel and other public utility workers) were tested for syphilis and gonorrhea. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis (in 2003 rubles) of the screening program using decision analysis models. RESULTS: In the total sample of 1000 study participants, overall prevalence for syphilis was 1.2% with the highest rate in market salespersons (4.4%) and for gonorrhea 0.3%. The incremental cost per case of STI treated was 8409 rubles ($252) for syphilis screening (compared with no screening) with higher incremental costs associated with expanding the program to include gonorrhea screening. The relatively low STI prevalence in the screened groups and the poor performance of the diagnostic tests used were important factors in the estimated cost-effectiveness of occupation-based screening. CONCLUSIONS: Modifications to occupation-based screening, including an increased focus on higher risk population and the adoption of more current diagnostic technologies, could help to use prevention resources more effectively.
Authors: C A Pace; D Lioznov; D M Cheng; S E Wakeman; A Raj; A Y Walley; S M Coleman; C Bridden; E Krupitsky; J H Samet Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Nadia Abdala; Edward White; Olga V Toussova; Tatiana V Krasnoselskikh; Sergei Verevochkin; Andrei P Kozlov; Robert Heimer Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-11-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Shaily B Surti; J K Kosambiya; Neeta Khokhar; Mohamedanas Mohamedfaruk Patni; Alpesh H Gohil; Zeel N Kamdar; Dipak Umrigar; Ragini Verma; Summaiya Mulla Journal: Indian J Community Med Date: 2017 Oct-Dec