Literature DB >> 18434927

Optimal placement of recording electrodes for quantifying facial nerve compound muscle action potential.

LanJun Guo1, Paul Jasiukaitis, Lawrence H Pitts, Steven W Cheung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze optimal placement of recording-needle electrodes surrounding the eye and lip for facial nerve monitoring by identifying the maximum compound muscle action potential (CMAP) recorded by electrode pairs of different spatial configurations. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial.
SETTING: Ambulatory surgery at a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Thirty adults undergoing chronic ear surgery such as tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy, ossicular chain reconstruction, stapedectomy, and cochlear implantation. INTERVENTION: Facial nerve monitoring. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Suprathreshold (threshold + 0.2 V) CMAP responses are recorded from referential paired needle electrodes placed into orbicularis oculi (1.5-cm spacing; n = 15) and orbicularis oris (1.0-cm spacing; n = 15) muscles. Optimal recording electrode placement is inferred by identifying the maximum evoked CMAP amplitude.
RESULTS: For the eye, placement of electrodes by the orbital rim and into the upper eyelid is significantly better (Friedman test; p < 0.01) than the other 2 configurations. For the lip, placement of electrodes into the oral commissure and either the upper or lower lip is satisfactory because there is no statistically significant difference among the configurations (Friedman test; p > 0.2).
CONCLUSION: Recording electrode placement configurations that capture the largest CMAP responses are recommended as standard operating procedure for intraoperative facial nerve monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18434927     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318171975e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  5 in total

1.  Mixed-muscle electrode placement ("jumping" muscles) may produce false-negative results when using transcranial motor evoked potentials to detect an isolated nerve root injury in a porcine model.

Authors:  Russ Lyon; Shane Burch; Jeremy Lieberman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Diagnostic Value of Facial Nerve Antidromic Evoked Potential in Patients With Bell's Palsy: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Lee; Sun Mi Kim; Hea Eun Yang; Jang Woo Lee; Yoon Ghil Park
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2014-06-26

3.  Prognostic value of facial nerve antidromic evoked potentials in bell palsy: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Zhang Wenhao; Chen Minjie; Yang Chi; Zhang Weijie
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-23

4.  Neurophysiological Characteristics of Cranial Nerves V- and VII-Triggered EMG in Endoscopic Endonasal Approach Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Carla J A Ferreira; Marcus Sherer; Katherine Anetakis; Donald J Crammond; Jeffrey R Balzer; Parthasarathy D Thirumala
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-03-25

Review 5.  Midline Facial Nerve Monitoring: Single-Center Experience and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Mohammed A Jomah; Eman A Hajr
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.316

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.