BACKGROUND: Barriers to evidence-based practice are not well understood. Within the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) significantly decreases mortality. However, LTVV has not achieved widespread adoption. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient demographic and clinical factors, and ICU organizational factors associated with its use. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study of 250 patients with ALI in 9 ICUs at 3 teaching hospitals in Baltimore, MD. MEASUREMENTS: Use of LTVV the day after ALI onset and association of patients' demographic and clinical factors and ICU organizational factors with LTVV using a multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for clustering of patients within ICUs. RESULTS: On the day after ALI onset, 46% and 81% of patients received a tidal volume < or = 6.5 and < or = 8.5 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW), respectively, with no significant changes at 3 and 5 days after ALI. Using a strict definition of LTVV (< or = 6.5 mL/kg PBW), no patient demographic factors were independently associated with LTVV; however, two patient clinical and ICU organizational factors (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) were independently associated: serum HCO3 level (< 22: .3, .1-.9, and > 26: .6, .1-3.5, versus 22-26) and use of a written protocol for LTVV (6.0, 1.3-27.2). In a sensitivity analysis using tidal volume < or = 8.5 mL/kg PBW, use of a written protocol remained significantly associated with LTVV. CONCLUSIONS: Patient demographic factors were not associated with LTVV. Given its strong association with LTVV, ICUs should use a written protocol for ventilation of ALI patients to help translate this evidence-based therapy into practice.
BACKGROUND: Barriers to evidence-based practice are not well understood. Within the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) significantly decreases mortality. However, LTVV has not achieved widespread adoption. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient demographic and clinical factors, and ICU organizational factors associated with its use. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study of 250 patients with ALI in 9 ICUs at 3 teaching hospitals in Baltimore, MD. MEASUREMENTS: Use of LTVV the day after ALI onset and association of patients' demographic and clinical factors and ICU organizational factors with LTVV using a multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for clustering of patients within ICUs. RESULTS: On the day after ALI onset, 46% and 81% of patients received a tidal volume < or = 6.5 and < or = 8.5 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW), respectively, with no significant changes at 3 and 5 days after ALI. Using a strict definition of LTVV (< or = 6.5 mL/kg PBW), no patient demographic factors were independently associated with LTVV; however, two patient clinical and ICU organizational factors (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) were independently associated: serum HCO3 level (< 22: .3, .1-.9, and > 26: .6, .1-3.5, versus 22-26) and use of a written protocol for LTVV (6.0, 1.3-27.2). In a sensitivity analysis using tidal volume < or = 8.5 mL/kg PBW, use of a written protocol remained significantly associated with LTVV. CONCLUSIONS:Patient demographic factors were not associated with LTVV. Given its strong association with LTVV, ICUs should use a written protocol for ventilation of ALI patients to help translate this evidence-based therapy into practice.
Authors: Mark E Mikkelsen; David F Gaieski; Munish Goyal; Andrea N Miltiades; Jeffrey C Munson; Jesse M Pines; Barry D Fuchs; Chirag V Shah; Scarlett L Bellamy; Jason D Christie Journal: Chest Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Arnaud Belard; Timothy Buchman; Jonathan Forsberg; Benjamin K Potter; Christopher J Dente; Allan Kirk; Eric Elster Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Curtis H Weiss; Jerry A Krishnan; David H Au; Bruce G Bender; Shannon S Carson; Adithya Cattamanchi; Michelle M Cloutier; Colin R Cooke; Karen Erickson; Maureen George; Joe K Gerald; Lynn B Gerald; Christopher H Goss; Michael K Gould; Robert Hyzy; Jeremy M Kahn; Brian S Mittman; Erika M Mosesón; Richard A Mularski; Sairam Parthasarathy; Sanjay R Patel; Cynthia S Rand; Nancy S Redeker; Theodore F Reiss; Kristin A Riekert; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Judith A Tate; Kevin C Wilson; Carey C Thomson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-10-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Dharmvir S Jaswal; Janice M Leung; Junfeng Sun; Xizhong Cui; Yan Li; Steven Kern; Judith Welsh; Charles Natanson; Peter Q Eichacker Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Abdulla Damluji; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Jonathan E Sevransky; Eddy Fan; Carl Shanholtz; Margaret Wojnar; Peter J Pronovost; Dale M Needham Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Marc Licker; John Diaper; Yann Villiger; Anastase Spiliopoulos; Virginie Licker; John Robert; Jean-Marie Tschopp Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-03-24 Impact factor: 9.097