Literature DB >> 18434885

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation rescue for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pediatric patients.

Shu-Chien Huang1, En-Ting Wu, Yih-Sharng Chen, Chung-I Chang, Ing-Sh Chiu, Shoei-Shen Wang, Fang-Yue Lin, Wen-Je Ko.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe survival and neurologic outcome and identify the factors associated with survival among pediatric patients following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for in-hospital cardiac arrest.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: A university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Eligible patients were < or = 18 yrs of age and received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during active cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest.
INTERVENTIONS: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during active cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. The secondary outcome was neurologic status after ECPR at hospital discharge and late follow-up. Good neurologic outcome was defined as Pediatric Cerebral Performance Categories 1, 2, and 3. Continuous variables were expressed as medians (interquartile range). We prospectively defined the early cohort (January 1999 to December 2001) and late cohort (January 2002 to January 2006) and compared the survival rates. We identified 27 ECPR events. The survival rate to hospital discharge was 41% (11 of 27). The nonsurvivors had higher pre-cardiopulmonary resuscitation serum lactate levels (14 [10.2-19.6] mmol/L vs. 8.5 [4.4-12.6] mmol/L, p < .01), longer durations of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (60 [37-81] mins vs. 45 [25-50] mins, p < .05) with longer activating time for ECMO (12.5 [7.5-33.8] mins vs. 5 [0-10] mins, p < .01), and more renal failure after ECPR (68% [11 of 16] vs. 9% [1 of 11], p < .01). The survival rate of the late cohort was better than that of the early cohort (58% [11 of 19] vs. 0% [0 of 8], p < .05). By exact multiple logistic regression analysis, the early cohort and renal failure after ECPR were two independent risk factors for mortality. Among the 11 survivors, ten had good neurologic outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: ECPR successfully rescued some pediatric patients who failed rescue with conventional in-hospital CPR. Good neurologic outcomes were achieved in the majority of the survivors. Early cohort and post-ECPR renal failure were associated with mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18434885     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318170b82b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  40 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric neurocritical care.

Authors:  Sarah Murphy
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Feasibility of initiating extracorporeal life support during mechanical chest compression CPR: a porcine pilot study.

Authors:  James J Menegazzi; David D Salcido; Greggory J Housler; Eric S Logue
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  Outcome predictors of pediatric extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Robert B Kelly; Rick E Harrison
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Pediatric Cardiac Population: In Search of a Standard of Care.

Authors:  Javier J Lasa; Parag Jain; Tia T Raymond; Charles G Minard; Alexis Topjian; Vinay Nadkarni; Michael Gaies; Melania Bembea; Paul A Checchia; Lara S Shekerdemian; Ravi Thiagarajan
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.624

7.  Duration of resuscitation prior to rescue extracorporeal membrane oxygenation impacts outcome in children with heart disease.

Authors:  V Ben Sivarajan; Derek Best; Christian P Brizard; Lara S Shekerdemian; Yves d'Udekem; Warwick Butt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Outcomes after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) following refractory pediatric cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Parthak Prodhan; Richard T Fiser; Umesh Dyamenahalli; Jeffrey Gossett; Michiaki Imamura; Robert D B Jaquiss; Adnan T Bhutta
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  A rodent model of emergency cardiopulmonary bypass resuscitation with different temperatures after asphyxial cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Fei Han; Manuel Boller; Wenhui Guo; Raina M Merchant; Joshua W Lampe; Thomas M Smith; Lance B Becker
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Multicenter cohort study of in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Kathleen L Meert; Amy Donaldson; Vinay Nadkarni; Kelly S Tieves; Charles L Schleien; Richard J Brilli; Robert S B Clark; Donald H Shaffner; Fiona Levy; Kimberly Statler; Heidi J Dalton; Elise W van der Jagt; Richard Hackbarth; Robert Pretzlaff; Lynn Hernan; J Michael Dean; Frank W Moler
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.