Literature DB >> 1843465

Clinical and microbiological findings on newly inserted hydroxyapatite-coated and pure titanium human dental implants.

T E Rams1, T W Roberts, D Feik, A K Molzan, J Slots.   

Abstract

The clinical and microbiologic features of 30 hydroxyapatite-coated root-form endosseous dental implants (Tri-Stage) were compared to 10 similar pure titanium implants without hydroxyapatite coatings. In 7 of 9 partially edentulous patients studied, pure titanium fixtures were placed adjacent to hydroxyapatite-coated implants. Implants in the maxilla were submerged beneath mucosal tissues after implant placement for a minimum of 6 months, and in the mandible for at least 4 months. All patients were prescribed short-term beta-lactam antibiotic therapy after fixture placement, and 8 of 9 used chlorhexidine mouthrinses after fixture exposure. Clinical and microbiological examination was carried out 7-10 months after fixed prosthetic loading of the implants. Clinical measurements included the gingival index, plaque index, bleeding on probing and peri-implant probing depths determined with the Florida Probe system. Subgingival microbial samples were collected with paper points and transported in VMGA III. Specimens were examined by direct phase-contrast microscopy and were plated onto nonselective and selective culture media for anaerobic and aerobic incubation. No significant mean clinical or microbiological differences were found between the implant types, although one hydroxyapatite-coated implant exhibited deep probing depths, bleeding on probing and marked radiographic crestal bone loss. Streptococcus sanguis and Streptococcus mitis were the most predominant organisms recovered from clinically stable implants, whereas high proportions of Fusobacterium species and Peptostreptococcus prevotii were isolated from the ailing hydroxyapatite-coated implant. One or more implants in 8 of the study subjects yielded enteric rods, pseudomonads, enterococci or staphylococci. The prognosis of implants with varying early microbiotas needs to be established in longitudinal studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1843465     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020304.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  4 in total

Review 1.  Microbiome of peri-implant infections: lessons from conventional, molecular and metagenomic analyses.

Authors:  Georgios Charalampakis; Georgios N Belibasakis
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 5.882

2.  Incorporation of staphylococci into titanium-grown biofilms: an in vitro "submucosal" biofilm model for peri-implantitis.

Authors:  Thomas Thurnheer; Georgios N Belibasakis
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Effects of Implant Surface Debridement and Systemic Antibiotics on the Clinical and Microbiological Variables of Periimplantitis.

Authors:  Muhammad Irshad; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Sajid Ali; Ahmad Alawneh; Mohammed Alhadi; Ahmed Alhadi; Ahmed Ali Alfawzan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Antimicrobial Activity Evaluation on Silver Doped Hydroxyapatite/Polydimethylsiloxane Composite Layer.

Authors:  C S Ciobanu; A Groza; S L Iconaru; C L Popa; P Chapon; M C Chifiriuc; R Hristu; G A Stanciu; C C Negrila; R V Ghita; M Ganciu; D Predoi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.