Literature DB >> 18434637

Selection of response criteria for clinical trials of sarcoma treatment.

Scott M Schuetze1, Laurence H Baker, Robert S Benjamin, Renzo Canetta.   

Abstract

Soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies arising from mesenchymal tissues. A large number of new therapies are being evaluated in patients with sarcomas, and consensus criteria defining treatment responses are essential for comparison of results from studies completed by different research groups. The 1979 World Health Organization (WHO) handbook set forth operationally defined criteria for response evaluation in solid tumors that were updated in 2000 with the publication of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). There have been significant advances in tumor imaging, however, that are not reflected in the RECIST. For example, computed tomography (CT) slice thickness has been reduced from 10 mm to < or =2.5 mm, allowing for more reproducible and accurate measurement of smaller lesions. Combination of imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG-PET) and CT can provide investigators and clinicians with both anatomical and functional information regarding tumors, and there is now a large body of evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of PET/CT and other newer imaging methods for the detection and staging of tumors as well as early determination of responses to therapy. The application of newer imaging methods has the potential to decrease both the sample sizes required for, and duration of, clinical trials by providing an early indication of therapeutic response that is well correlated with clinical outcomes, such as time to tumor progression or overall survival. The results summarized in this review support the conclusion that the RECIST and the WHO criteria for evaluation of response in solid tumors need to be modernized. In addition, there is a current need for prospective trials to compare new response criteria with established endpoints and to validate imaging-based response rates as surrogate endpoints for clinical trials of new agents for sarcoma and other solid tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18434637     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.13-S2-32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  24 in total

Review 1.  [Current state of neoadjuvant therapy of soft tissue sarcoma].

Authors:  M Lehnhardt; T Schmitt; M Bischof; A Daigeler; G Egerer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy is predictive of oncological outcome in patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Dhruvil Shah; Dariusz Borys; Steve R Martinez; Chin-Shang Li; Robert M Tamurian; Richard J Bold; Arta Monjazeb; Robert J Canter
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  Outcome of Patients With Recurrent Osteosarcoma Enrolled in Seven Phase II Trials Through Children's Cancer Group, Pediatric Oncology Group, and Children's Oncology Group: Learning From the Past to Move Forward.

Authors:  Joanne P Lagmay; Mark D Krailo; Ha Dang; AeRang Kim; Douglas S Hawkins; Orren Beaty; Brigitte C Widemann; Theodore Zwerdling; Lisa Bomgaars; Anne-Marie Langevin; Holcombe E Grier; Brenda Weigel; Susan M Blaney; Richard Gorlick; Katherine A Janeway
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Predicting outcome by growth rate of locally recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: the one centimeter per month rule.

Authors:  James O Park; Li-Xuan Qin; Francesco P Prete; Cristina Antonescu; Murray F Brennan; Samuel Singer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Radiographic and histologic response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Robert J Canter; Steve R Martinez; Robert M Tamurian; Maaya Wilton; Chin-Shang Li; Janice Ryu; Walter Mak; Wayne L Monsky; Dariusz Borys
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Trabectedin for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective single center analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Schmitt; Eva Keller; Sascha Dietrich; Patrick Wuchter; Anthony D Ho; Gerlinde Egerer
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.118

7.  Semi-automated volumetric quantification of tumor necrosis in soft tissue sarcoma using contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Wayne L Monsky; Bedro Jin; Chris Molloy; Robert J Canter; Chin Shang Li; Tzu C Lin; Daniel Borys; Walter Mack; Isaac Kim; Michael H Buonocore; Abhijit J Chaudhari
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.480

8.  Evaluation of cancer treatment in the abdomen: Trends and advances.

Authors:  Silanath Peungjesada; Hubert H Chuang; Srinivasa R Prasad; Haesun Choi; Evelyne M Loyer; Yulia Bronstein
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-28

Review 9.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 10.  PET-CT imaging in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  M Beth McCarville
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.