Literature DB >> 18433981

Desalinated versus recycled water: public perceptions and profiles of the accepters.

Sara Dolnicar1, Andrea I Schäfer.   

Abstract

Many countries' water resources are limited in both quantity and quality. While engineering solutions can now safely produce recycled and desalinated water from non-potable sources at a relatively low cost, the general public is sceptical about adopting these alternative water sources. Social scientists, policy makers and technical experts need to better understand what is causing this lack of acceptance by the general population and how acceptance levels for recycled and desalinated water can be increased. This study is the first to conduct a comparative analysis of knowledge, perceptions, and acceptability, and determine segments of residents who are more open-minded than the general population toward the use of recycled and desalinated water. The Australian population once perceived desalinated water as environmentally unfriendly, and recycled water as a public health hazard. The general level of knowledge about these two concepts as potential water sources has historically been low. After nearly five years of serious drought, accompanied by severe water restrictions across most of the country, and subsequent media attention on solutions to water scarcity, Australians now show more acceptance of desalinated water for close-to-body uses, and less resistance to recycled water for garden watering and cleaning uses. The types of people likely to be strong accepters of the two alternative water sources are distinctly different groups, and can be reached through different media mixes. This finding has significant implications for policy makers and water practitioners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18433981     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  13 in total

Review 1.  Biodesalination: a case study for applications of photosynthetic bacteria in water treatment.

Authors:  Jaime M Amezaga; Anna Amtmann; Catherine A Biggs; Tom Bond; Catherine J Gandy; Annegret Honsbein; Esther Karunakaran; Linda Lawton; Mary Ann Madsen; Konstantinos Minas; Michael R Templeton
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Health assessment of spatial and temporal distribution of arsenic in soils irrigated with reclaimed water.

Authors:  Shibao Lu; Xiaoling Zhang; Liang Pei; Min Guo
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Factors influencing the reuse of reclaimed water as a management option to augment water supplies.

Authors:  May A Massoud; Arine Kazarian; Ibrahim Alameddine; Mahmoud Al-Hindi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  What affects public acceptance of recycled and desalinated water?

Authors:  Sara Dolnicar; Anna Hurlimann; Bettina Grün
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Water conservation behavior in Australia.

Authors:  Sara Dolnicar; Anna Hurlimann; Bettina Grün
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 6.789

6.  Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches.

Authors:  Daniela A Schmieder; Hugo A Benítez; Ivailo M Borissov; Carmelo Fruciano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Early testing of new sanitation technology for urban slums: The case of the Blue Diversion Toilet.

Authors:  Robert Tobias; Mark O'Keefe; Rahel Künzle; Heiko Gebauer; Harald Gründl; Eberhard Morgenroth; Wouter Pronk; Tove A Larsen
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Influence of Household Water Filters on Bacteria Growth and Trace Metals in Tap Water of Doha, Qatar.

Authors:  Jerome Nriagu; Chuanwu Xi; Azhar Siddique; Annette Vincent; Basem Shomar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Public perception of drinking water safety in South Africa 2002-2009: a repeated cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jim A Wright; Hong Yang; Ulrike Rivett; Stephen W Gundry
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Branding water.

Authors:  Sara Dolnicar; Anna Hurlimann; Bettina Grün
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 11.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.