Literature DB >> 18433737

Flanker interference in young and older participants as reflected in event-related potentials.

Nele Wild-Wall1, Michael Falkenstein, Joachim Hohnsbein.   

Abstract

The present study investigates behavioural and event-related potential (ERP) differences between young and older participants in two variants of a flanker task. Flankers preceded the target by 100 ms (Experiment 1) or were presented simultaneously with the target (Experiment 2). In both experiments the response times showed an age-related slowing and a compatibility effect, which did not differ significantly across age. The older participants committed only half as many errors as the young ones. The visual ERPs revealed that the speed of visual perception was similar between groups. In addition the processing of the targets, but not of the flankers, appeared to be enhanced in the older participants. Moreover the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) started later and was larger for old vs. young participants, which was most pronounced for the incorrect LRP activation due to the flankers. The LRP amplitude effect is due to an enhanced activation over contralateral motor areas, which appears to be a general finding unrelated to the error rate. In summary, in the present study we could not find evidence for enhanced flanker interference in the performance of older compared to young participants. The reduced error rates for older participants are likely due to enhanced processing of the targets and delayed transmission of flanker information from visual to motor areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18433737     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  34 in total

1.  An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli.

Authors:  Paul S Mattson; Lisa R Fournier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

2.  On the time course of attentional focusing in older adults.

Authors:  Lisa N Jefferies; Alexa B Roggeveen; James T Enns; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-15

Review 3.  [Cognitive competence of older workers].

Authors:  N Wild-Wall; P Gajewski; M Falkenstein
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 4.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of inhibition: cognitive control, source localization and age-related modulations.

Authors:  Luís Pires; José Leitão; Chiara Guerrini; Mário R Simões
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Age-related differences in distractor interference on line bisection.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Alessandro Iavarone; Leonardo Iaccarino; Marco La Marra; Giovanni Messina; Vincenzo De Luca; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Inhibition in aging: What is preserved? What declines? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Miriam Gade
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

7.  Transient and sustained incentive effects on electrophysiological indices of cognitive control in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Ryan S Williams; Farrah Kudus; Benjamin J Dyson; Julia Spaniol
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Dissociation of preparatory attention and response monitoring maturation during adolescence.

Authors:  M L Padilla; A Pfefferbaum; E V Sullivan; F C Baker; I M Colrain
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Response-specific slowing in older age revealed through differential stimulus and response effects on P300 latency and reaction time.

Authors:  Theodore R Bashore; Scott A Wylie; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Jacques M Martinerie
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2013-11-06

10.  Age-related delay in information accrual for faces: evidence from a parametric, single-trial EEG approach.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Jesse S Husk; Cyril R Pernet; Carl M Gaspar; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.