Literature DB >> 18433736

Fewer active motors per vesicle may explain slowed vesicle transport in chick motoneurons after three days in vitro.

Jed C Macosko1, Jason M Newbern, Jean Rockford, Ernest N Chisena, Charlotte M Brown, George M Holzwarth, Carol E Milligan.   

Abstract

Vesicle transport in cultured chick motoneurons was studied over a period of 3 days using motion-enhanced differential interference contrast (MEDIC) microscopy, an improved version of video-enhanced DIC. After 3 days in vitro (DIV), the average vesicle velocity was about 30% less than after 1 DIV. In observations at 1, 2 and 3 DIV, larger vesicles moved more slowly than small vesicles, and retrograde vesicles were larger than anterograde vesicles. The number of retrograde vesicles increased relative to anterograde vesicles after 3 DIV, but this fact alone could not explain the decrease in velocity, since the slowing of vesicle transport in maturing motoneurons was observed independently for both anterograde and retrograde vesicles. In order to better understand the slowing trend, the distance vs. time trajectories of individual vesicles were examined at a frame rate of 8.3/s. Qualitatively, these trajectories consisted of short (1-2 s) segments of constant velocity, and the changes in velocity between segments were abrupt (<0.2 s). The trajectories were therefore fit to a series of connected straight lines. Surprisingly, the slopes of theses lines, i.e. the vesicle velocities, were often found to be multiples of ~0.6 mum/s. The velocity histogram showed multiple peaks, which, when fit with Gaussians using a least squares minimization, yielded an average spacing of 0.57 mum/s (taken as the slope of a fit to peak position vs. peak number, R(2)=0.994). We propose that the abrupt velocity changes occur when 1 or 2 motors suddenly begin or cease actively participating in vesicle transport. Under this hypothesis, the decrease in average vesicle velocity observed for maturing motoneurons is due to a decrease in the average number of active motors per vesicle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18433736      PMCID: PMC2464625          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  26 in total

Review 1.  The molecular motor toolbox for intracellular transport.

Authors:  Ronald D Vale
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Cargo-carrying motor vehicles on the neuronal highway: transport pathways and neurodegenerative disease.

Authors:  Shermali Gunawardena; Lawrence S B Goldstein
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2004-02-05

3.  Fast vesicle transport in PC12 neurites: velocities and forces.

Authors:  D B Hill; M J Plaza; K Bonin; G Holzwarth
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 1.733

4.  Polarization-modulated differential-interference contrast microscopy with a variable retarder.

Authors:  G M Holzwarth; D B Hill; E B McLaughlin
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 1.980

5.  Kinesin and dynein move a peroxisome in vivo: a tug-of-war or coordinated movement?

Authors:  Comert Kural; Hwajin Kim; Sheyum Syed; Gohta Goshima; Vladimir I Gelfand; Paul R Selvin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Suppression of cathepsins B and L causes a proliferation of lysosomes and the formation of meganeurites in hippocampus.

Authors:  E Bednarski; C E Ribak; G Lynch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Axoplasmic transport (with particular respect to adrenergic neurons).

Authors:  A Dahlström
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1971-06-17       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  New observations on cell architecture and dynamics by video-enhanced contrast optical microscopy.

Authors:  R D Allen
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem       Date:  1985

9.  Video-enhanced microscopy with a computer frame memory.

Authors:  R D Allen; N S Allen
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Computer analysis of organelle translocation in primary neuronal cultures and continuous cell lines.

Authors:  A C Breuer; C N Christian; M Henkart; P G Nelson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  6 in total

1.  Bidirectional transport by molecular motors: enhanced processivity and response to external forces.

Authors:  Melanie J I Müller; Stefan Klumpp; Reinhard Lipowsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Intraneuronal vesicular organelle transport changes with cell population density in vitro.

Authors:  Clayton T Bauer; Yuri Shtridelman; Carla M Lema Tomé; Joel Q Grim; Christopher P Turner; Michael Tytell; Jed C Macosko
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Force-velocity curves of motor proteins cooperating in vivo.

Authors:  Yuri Shtridelman; Thomas Cahyuti; Brigitte Townsend; David DeWitt; Jed C Macosko
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.194

4.  Motion-enhanced, differential interference contrast (MEDIC) microscopy of moving vesicles in live cells: VE-DIC updated.

Authors:  D B Hill; J C Macosko; G M Holzwarth
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  Dynamics of peptidergic secretory granule transport are regulated by neuronal stimulation.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Sobota; William A Mohler; Ann E Cowan; Betty A Eipper; Richard E Mains
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 3.288

6.  Kinesin velocity increases with the number of motors pulling against viscoelastic drag.

Authors:  Jason Gagliano; Matthew Walb; Brian Blaker; Jed C Macosko; George Holzwarth
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 1.733

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.