Literature DB >> 1843255

Mesothelioma dose response following intraperitoneal injection of mineral fibres.

J M Davis1, R E Bolton, B G Miller, K Niven.   

Abstract

The relationship between injected dose and the development of peritoneal mesotheliomas has been examined in rats using the UTCC standard reference samples of chrysotile, crocidolite and amosite as well as a sample of fibrous erionite from Oregon. Doses injected into the peritoneal cavity ranged from 0.005 to 25 mg and with each dust a clear dose response was found. The proportion of animals developing tumours increased with the amount of dust injected while the tumour induction period was reduced. When times to death from mesothelioma were analysed using standard hazard models, erionite was the most carcinogenic dust by mass followed by chrysotile, amosite and crocidolite. The hazard slopes for erionite, chrysotile and crocidolite, over the range of doses examined, were parallel while the slope for amosite was shallower. The relative hazards for the various dust types were also examined with dose expressed as the number of injected fibres in a range of sizes as measured by SEM. No combination of fibre dimensions was found at which the hazard for the four dust types was equal although when dose was expressed as the number of long fibres injected (> 8 microns in length) the hazard slopes for chrysotile, crocidolite and amosite were relatively close. The hazard level of erionite remained well above the other dust types regardless of how the dose was expressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1843255      PMCID: PMC2001943     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol        ISSN: 0959-9673            Impact factor:   1.925


  8 in total

1.  Diffuse pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the North Western Cape Province.

Authors:  J C WAGNER; C A SLEGGS; P MARCHAND
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1960-10

2.  Environmental mesothelioma in Turkey.

Authors:  Y I Bariş; M Artvinli; A A Sahin
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Mechanisms of mesothelioma induction with asbestos and fibrous glass.

Authors:  M F Stanton; C Wrench
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Is asbestos or asbestosis the cause of the increased risk of lung cancer in asbestos workers?

Authors:  K Browne
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1986-03

5.  Variations in the carcinogenicity of mineral fibres.

Authors:  R E Bolton; J M Davis; K Donaldson; A Wright
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1982

6.  Comparisons of the pathogenicity of long and short fibres of chrysotile asbestos in rats.

Authors:  J M Davis; A D Jones
Journal:  Br J Exp Pathol       Date:  1988-10

7.  Mesotheliomata in rats after inoculation with asbestos and other materials.

Authors:  J C Wagner; G Berry; V Timbrell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The effects of the inhalation of asbestos in rats.

Authors:  J C Wagner; G Berry; J W Skidmore; V Timbrell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  The effects of carbon nanotubes on lung and dermal cellular behaviors.

Authors:  Sudjit Luanpitpong; Liying Wang; Yon Rojanasakul
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.307

2.  Erionite bodies and fibres in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of residents from Tuzköy, Cappadocia, Turkey.

Authors:  P Dumortier; L Coplü; I Broucke; S Emri; T Selcuk; V de Maertelaer; P De Vuyst; I Baris
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  A commentary on Roggli's "The So-Called Short-Fiber Controversy".

Authors:  David Egilman; Triet Tran
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-05-24

Review 4.  Role of mutagenicity in asbestos fiber-induced carcinogenicity and other diseases.

Authors:  Sarah X L Huang; Marie-Claude Jaurand; David W Kamp; John Whysner; Tom K Hei
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

5.  Mesothelioma Mouse Models with Mixed Genomic States of Chromosome and Microsatellite Instability.

Authors:  Yurong Song; Shaneen S Baxter; Lisheng Dai; Chelsea Sanders; Sandra Burkett; Ryan N Baugher; Stephanie D Mellott; Todd B Young; Heidi E Lawhorn; Simone Difilippantonio; Baktiar Karim; Yuwaraj Kadariya; Ligia A Pinto; Joseph R Testa; Robert H Shoemaker
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Carcinogenic Potential of High Aspect Ratio Carbon Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Sudjit Luanpitpong; Liying Wang; Donna C Davidson; Heimo Riedel; Yon Rojanasakul
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2016-04-06

7.  Erionite series minerals: mineralogical and carcinogenic properties.

Authors:  A Umran Dogan; Meral Dogan; John A Hoskins
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.609

8.  Lung cancer and mesothelioma in the pleura and peritoneum among Swedish insulation workers.

Authors:  B Järvholm; A Sandén
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 9.  Nonpulmonary outcomes of asbestos exposure.

Authors:  Melisa Bunderson-Schelvan; Jean C Pfau; Robert Crouch; Andrij Holian
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

10.  Fiber-specific molecular features of tumors induced in rat peritoneum.

Authors:  K Unfried; M Roller; F Pott; J Friemann; W Dehnen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.