Literature DB >> 18432447

Bone conduction reception: head sensitivity mapping.

Maranda McBride1, Tomasz Letowski, Phuong Tran.   

Abstract

This study sought to identify skull locations that are highly sensitive to bone conduction (BC) auditory signal reception and could be used in the design of military radio communication headsets. In Experiment 1, pure tone signals were transmitted via BC to 11 skull locations of 14 volunteers seated in a quiet environment. In Experiment 2, the same signals were transmitted via BC to nine skull locations of 12 volunteers seated in an environment with 60 decibels of white background noise. Hearing threshold levels for each signal per location were measured. In the quiet condition, the condyle had the lowest mean threshold for all signals followed by the jaw angle, mastoid and vertex. In the white noise condition, the condyle also had the lowest mean threshold followed by the mastoid, vertex and temple. Overall results of both experiments were very similar and implicated the condyle as the most effective location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18432447     DOI: 10.1080/00140130701747509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  2 in total

1.  Effects of Stimulation Position and Frequency Band on Auditory Spatial Perception with Bilateral Bone Conduction.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Xikun Lu; Jinqiu Sang; Juanjuan Cai; Chengshi Zheng
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

2.  The Effect of Stimulation Position and Ear Canal Occlusion on Perception of Bone Conducted Sound.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Stefan Stenfelt; Shengjian Wu; Zhihao Yan; Jinqiu Sang; Chengshi Zheng; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.