Literature DB >> 18431541

The efficacy of intermittent cervical traction in patents with chronic neck pain.

Pinar Borman1, Dilek Keskin, Betul Ekici, Hatice Bodur.   

Abstract

Previous studies about the usefulness of traction therapy have concluded with conflicting results. The aim of this study was to examine its efficacy in chronic neck pain. Forty-two patients with at least 6 weeks of nonspecific neck pain were selected for the study. Data about demographic characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, duration of cervical pain, working status, smoking status, and regular exercise were recorded. Each patient was randomly assigned to Group 1-receiving only standard physical therapy including hot pack, ultrasound therapy and exercise program and Group 2-treated with traction therapy in addition to standard physical therapy. The patients were reevaluated at the end of the therapy. The main outcome measures of the treatment were pain intensity by visual analog scale (VAS), disability by neck disability index (NDI), and quality of life assessed by Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). Twenty-four female and 18 male patients with mean age of 48.2+/-11.5 years and a mean disease duration of 4.3+/-2.9 years were included to the study. There were no differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, pain intensity, and scores of NHP and NDI at entry. There were 21 patients in both groups. Both groups improved significantly in pain intensity and the scores of NDI and physical subscles of NHP at the end of the therapies (p<0.05). There was an association between NDI and VAS pain scores in both groups (p<0.05). No correlation was observed between clinical variables and age and duration of disease. In conclusion, no specific effect of traction over standard physiotherapeutic interventions was observed in adults with chronic neck pain. We suggest the clinicians to consider this condition and to focus on exercise therapy in the management of patients suffering from this condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18431541     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-008-0895-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  15 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical traction for mechanical neck disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nadine Graham; Anita R Gross; Charlie Goldsmith
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile.

Authors:  A A Kücükdeveci; S P McKenna; S Kutlay; Y Gürsel; D Whalley; T Arasil
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Pain, coping, emotional state and physical function in patients with chronic radicular neck pain. A comparison between patients treated with surgery, physiotherapy or neck collar--a blinded, prospective randomized study.

Authors:  L C Persson; A Lilja
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2001-05-20       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  A randomized clinical trial of exercise and spinal manipulation for patients with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  G Bronfort; R Evans; B Nelson; P D Aker; C H Goldsmith; H Vernon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Physical medicine modalities for mechanical neck disorders.

Authors:  A R Gross; P D Aker; C H Goldsmith; P Peloso
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

Review 6.  The diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  G A Malanga
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Randomised trial of a brief physiotherapy intervention compared with usual physiotherapy for neck pain patients: outcomes and patients' preference.

Authors:  Jennifer A Klaber Moffett; David A Jackson; Stewart Richmond; Seokyung Hahn; Simon Coulton; Amanda Farrin; Andrea Manca; David J Torgerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-12-07

8.  Intensive training, physiotherapy, or manipulation for patients with chronic neck pain. A prospective, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  A Jordan; T Bendix; H Nielsen; F R Hansen; D Høst; A Winkel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Validity and reliability of a modified version of the neck disability index.

Authors:  Birgitta Helmerson Ackelman; Urban Lindgren
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Cervical spine disorders. A comparison of three types of traction.

Authors:  R S Zylbergold; M C Piper
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Multimodal treatment program comparing 2 different traction approaches for patients with discogenic cervical radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Moustafa; Aliaa A Diab
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2014-09

2.  Effectiveness of the gaze direction recognition task for chronic neck pain and cervical range of motion: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Satoshi Nobusako; Atsushi Matsuo; Shu Morioka
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2012-05-07

3.  Comparative effectiveness of transverse oscillatory pressure and cervical traction in the management of cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Adesola Ojo Ojoawo; Ayodele Damilare Olabode
Journal:  Hong Kong Physiother J       Date:  2018-08-14

4.  Acupuncture for chronic neck pain: a protocol for an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Qinhong Zhang; Jinhuan Yue; Xiangxin Zeng; Zhongren Sun; Brenda Golianu
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-04

5.  The efficacy of a home-mechanical traction unit for patients with mild to moderate cervical osteoarthrosis: A pilot study.

Authors:  Batoul Bagheripour; Mojtaba Kamyab; Fatemeh Azadinia; Ali Amiri; Mohammad Akbari
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-06-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.