Literature DB >> 18430433

Developmental trends in everyday conditional reasoning: the retrieval and inhibition interplay.

Wim De Neys1, Deborah Everaerts.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined developmental patterns in children's conditional reasoning with everyday causal conditionals. In Experiment 1, a group of pre-, early, young, and late adolescents generated counterexamples for a set of conditionals to validate developmental claims about the counterexample retrieval capacity. In Experiment 2, participants in the same age range were presented with a conditional reasoning task with similar conditionals. Experiment 1 established that counterexample retrieval increased from preadolescence to late adolescence. Experiment 2 showed that acceptance rates of the invalid affirmation of the consequent inference gradually decreased in the same age range. Acceptance rates of the valid modus ponens inference showed a U-shaped pattern. After an initial drop from preadolescence to early adolescence, modus ponens acceptance ratings increased again after the onset of adolescence. Findings support the claim that the development of everyday conditional reasoning can be characterized as an interplay between the development of a counterexample retrieval and inhibition process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18430433     DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  6 in total

1.  The capacity to generate alternative ideas is more important than inhibition for logical reasoning in preschool-age children.

Authors:  Pier-Luc de Chantal; Henry Markovits
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-02

2.  How children and adults keep track of real information when thinking counterfactually.

Authors:  Jesica Gómez-Sánchez; José Antonio Ruiz-Ballesteros; Sergio Moreno-Ríos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Helping reasoners succeed in the Wason selection task: when executive learning discourages heuristic response but does not necessarily encourage logic.

Authors:  Sandrine Rossi; Mathieu Cassotti; Sylvain Moutier; Nicolas Delcroix; Olivier Houdé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Set-shifting and inhibition interplay affect the rule-matching bias occurrence during conditional reasoning task.

Authors:  Seyyedeh Fatemeh Seyyed Hashemi; Reza Khosrowabadi; Mohsen Karimi
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-06

5.  Training-induced behavioral and brain plasticity in inhibitory control.

Authors:  Lucas Spierer; Camille F Chavan; Aurelie L Manuel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Impaired neural processing of transitive relations in children with math learning difficulty.

Authors:  Flora Schwartz; Justine Epinat-Duclos; Jessica Léone; Alice Poisson; Jérôme Prado
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.881

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.