Literature DB >> 18429581

Consideration of psychosocial factors in the evaluation of living donors.

Nina M Schroder1, Laurie A McDonald, Geri Etringer, Michele Snyders.   

Abstract

Results of donor outcome studies indicate that most living donors report a positive psychosocial response to donation. However, negative psychosocial outcomes have also been reported. Evaluation guidelines have been proposed, although a standardized evaluation specific to living donors is not yet available. In an effort to determine what psychosocial factors should be considered in a comprehensive evaluation of living donors, an extensive literature review was undertaken that was focused on previously proposed guidelines for the psychosocial evaluation of living donors, research on outcomes among living donors, and other relevant psychosocial data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18429581     DOI: 10.1177/152692480801800109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Transplant        ISSN: 1526-9248            Impact factor:   1.065


  7 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial and socioeconomic issues facing the living kidney donor.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Cheryl L Jacobs
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.620

2.  The Mount Sinai Patient-Centered Preoperative Criteria Meant to Optimize Outcomes Are Less of a Barrier to Care Than WPATH SOC 7 Criteria Before Transgender-Specific Surgery.

Authors:  Max Lichtenstein; Laura Stein; Erin Connolly; Zil G Goldstein; Tyler Martinson; Linda Tiersten; Sangyoon J Shin; John Henry Pang; Joshua D Safer
Journal:  Transgend Health       Date:  2020-09-02

3.  Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Living Kidney Donation: A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  James R Rodrigue; Tanya Vishnevsky; Aaron Fleishman; Tracy Brann; Amy R Evenson; Martha Pavlakis; Didier A Mandelbrot
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2015-09

4.  Preventive intervention for living donor psychosocial outcomes: feasibility and efficacy in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M A Dew; A F DiMartini; A J DeVito Dabbs; A Zuckoff; H P Tan; M L McNulty; G E Switzer; K R Fox; J B Greenhouse; A Humar
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Ethical issues regarding related and nonrelated living organ donors.

Authors:  Giuliano Testa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Prevention of poor psychosocial outcomes in living organ donors: from description to theory-driven intervention development and initial feasibility testing.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Allan Zuckoff; Andrea F DiMartini; Annette J DeVito Dabbs; Mary L McNulty; Kristen R Fox; Galen E Switzer; Abhinav Humar; Henkie P Tan
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.187

7.  Post-donation satisfaction in kidney transplantation: a survey of living donors in Japan.

Authors:  Sayaka Kobayashi; Rie Akaho; Kazuya Omoto; Hiroki Shirakawa; Tomokazu Shimizu; Hideki Ishida; Kazunari Tanabe; Katsuji Nishimura
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.