Literature DB >> 18428086

Which aspects of HTS are empirically correlated with downstream success?

Andreas Bender1, Dejan Bojanic, John W Davies, Thomas J Crisman, Dmitri Mikhailov, Josef Scheiber, Jeremy L Jenkins, Zhan Deng, W Adam G Hill, Maxim Popov, Edgar Jacoby, Meir Glick.   

Abstract

High-throughput screening (HTS) is a well-established hit-finding approach used in the pharmaceutical industry. In this article, recent experience at Novartis with respect to factors influencing the success of HTS campaigns is discussed. An inherent measure of HTS quality could be defined by the assay Z and Z' factors, the number of hits and their biological potencies; however, such measures of quality do not always correlate with the advancement of hits to the later stages of drug discovery. Also, for many target classes, such as kinases, it is easy to identify hits, but, as a result of selectivity, intellectual property and other issues, the projects do not result in lead declarations. In this article, HTS success is defined as the fraction of HTS campaigns that advance into the later stages of drug discovery, and the major influencing factors are examined. Interestingly, screening compounds in individual wells or in mixtures did not have a major impact on the HTS success and, equally interesting, there was no difference in the progression rates of biochemical and cell-based assays. Particular target types, assay technologies, structure-activity relationships and powder availability had a much greater impact on success as defined above. In addition, significant mutual dependencies can be observed - while one assay format works well with one target type, this situation might be completely reversed for a combination of the same readout technology with a different target type. The results and opinions presented here should be regarded as groundwork, and a plethora of factors that influence the fate of a project, such as biophysical measurements, chemical attractiveness of the hits, strategic reasons and safety pharmacology, are not covered here. Nonetheless, it is hoped that this information will be used industry-wide to improve success rates in terms of hits progressing into exploratory chemistry and beyond. The support that can be obtained from new in silico approaches to phase transitions are also described, along with the gaps they are designed to fill.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18428086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel        ISSN: 1367-6733


  12 in total

1.  Plate-based diversity subset screening: an efficient paradigm for high throughput screening of a large screening file.

Authors:  Andrew S Bell; Joseph Bradley; Jeremy R Everett; Michelle Knight; Jens Loesel; John Mathias; David McLoughlin; James Mills; Robert E Sharp; Christine Williams; Terence P Wood
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.943

2.  Toward the computer-aided discovery of FabH inhibitors. Do predictive QSAR models ensure high quality virtual screening performance?

Authors:  Yunierkis Pérez-Castillo; Maykel Cruz-Monteagudo; Cosmin Lazar; Jonatan Taminau; Mathy Froeyen; Miguel Angel Cabrera-Pérez; Ann Nowé
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  HTS-Compatible Patient-Derived Cell-Based Assay to Identify Small Molecule Modulators of Aberrant Splicing in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1.

Authors:  Debra A O'Leary; Leonardo Vargas; Orzala Sharif; Michael E Garcia; Yury J Sigal; Siu-Kei Chow; Christian Schmedt; Jeremy S Caldwell; Achim Brinker; Ingo H Engels
Journal:  Curr Chem Genomics       Date:  2010-03-19

4.  Mechanism of PTC124 activity in cell-based luciferase assays of nonsense codon suppression.

Authors:  Douglas S Auld; Natasha Thorne; William F Maguire; James Inglese
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Rethinking drug design in the artificial intelligence era.

Authors:  Petra Schneider; W Patrick Walters; Alleyn T Plowright; Norman Sieroka; Jennifer Listgarten; Robert A Goodnow; Jasmin Fisher; Johanna M Jansen; José S Duca; Thomas S Rush; Matthias Zentgraf; John Edward Hill; Elizabeth Krutoholow; Matthias Kohler; Jeff Blaney; Kimito Funatsu; Chris Luebkemann; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  A network-based multi-target computational estimation scheme for anticoagulant activities of compounds.

Authors:  Qian Li; Xudong Li; Canghai Li; Lirong Chen; Jun Song; Yalin Tang; Xiaojie Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Are phylogenetic trees suitable for chemogenomics analyses of bioactivity data sets: the importance of shared active compounds and choosing a suitable data embedding method, as exemplified on Kinases.

Authors:  Shardul Paricharak; Tom Klenka; Martin Augustin; Umesh A Patel; Andreas Bender
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 5.514

8.  When Quality Beats Quantity: Decision Theory, Drug Discovery, and the Reproducibility Crisis.

Authors:  Jack W Scannell; Jim Bosley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Fusing Docking Scoring Functions Improves the Virtual Screening Performance for Discovering Parkinson's Disease Dual Target Ligands.

Authors:  Yunierkis Perez-Castillo; Aliuska Morales Helguera; M Natalia D S Cordeiro; Eduardo Tejera; Cesar Paz-Y-Mino; Aminael Sanchez-Rodriguez; Fernanda Borges; Maykel Cruz-Monteagudo
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 7.363

Review 10.  HTS and hit finding in academia--from chemical genomics to drug discovery.

Authors:  Julie A Frearson; Iain T Collie
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 7.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.