Literature DB >> 18427749

Safety and reliability of external fixation for basicervical and intertrochanteric fractures in high-risk elderly patients.

George W Boghdady1, Mohammed Shalaby.   

Abstract

Forty elderly patients with basicervical and pertrochanteric fractures were managed with uniplanar AO external fixator under regional anaesthetic block of the femoral nerve and lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh from April 2003 to March 2006. The mean age of the patients was 67.9 +/- 5.5 years. External fixator application was performed under radiological control after closed reduction had been obtained. Comorbid factors, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalisation, complications, walking ability, time to union and mortality rate were recorded. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 12 +/- 4.5 months. Superficial pin tract infection occurred in 13 patients, healing in varus >10 degrees and with shortening >2 cm occurred in six patients, and one patient suffered a spontaneous ipsilateral femoral neck fracture after removal of the fixator. The mean time for union was 10.4 +/- 1.2 weeks. Rapid union rate and minor complications obtained in the present study are comparable to those obtained with standard internal fixation techniques. Minimal intraoperative blood loss, short operative time and early patient mobilisation are advantages signifying uniplanar external fixator application under regional anaesthetic block to be a viable option in treatment of basicervical and pertrochanteric fractures in high-risk elderly patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18427749      PMCID: PMC2322840          DOI: 10.1007/s11751-007-0025-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr        ISSN: 1828-8928


  23 in total

1.  Reliability of classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in experienced orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Wen-Jie Jin; Li-Yang Dai; Yi-Min Cui; Qing Zhou; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Hua Lu
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Management of pertrochanteric fractures in the elderly patients with an external fixation.

Authors:  N Kourtzis; D Pafilas; G Kasimatis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Postoperative weight-bearing after a fracture of the femoral neck or an intertrochanteric fracture.

Authors:  K J Koval; D A Sala; F J Kummer; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Biomechanical comparison of internal fixation techniques for the treatment of unstable basicervical femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  D A Deneka; P T Simonian; C J Stankewich; D Eckert; J R Chapman; A F Tencer
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Rate of mortality for elderly patients after fracture of the hip in the 1980's.

Authors:  B L White; W D Fisher; C A Laurin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The external fixator compared with the sliding hip screw for pertrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Authors:  I C Vossinakis; L S Badras
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-01

7.  External fixator in the management of trochanteric fractures in high risk geriatric patients--a friend to the elderly.

Authors:  A Devgan; S S Sangwan
Journal:  Indian J Med Sci       Date:  2002-08

8.  Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur. A biomechanical study of 3 internal fixation techniques.

Authors:  B Blair; K J Koval; F Kummer; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems.

Authors:  Humayon Pervez; Martyn J Parker; Glyn A Pryor; Lennel Lutchman; Nishan Chirodian
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  External fixation in unstable intertrochanteric fractures of femur.

Authors:  K T Kamble; B S Murthy; V Pal; K S Ráo
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  4 in total

1.  Distal femoral osteotomy: is internal fixation better than external?

Authors:  K T Matthew Seah; Raheel Shafi; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparison of the Dynamic Hip Screw with the Dynamic Hip External Fixator for Intertrochanteric Fractures: Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ali Moradi; Meisam Moradi; Maryam Emadzadeh; Farshid Bagheri
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-11

Review 3.  Use of external fixators in developing countries: a short socioeconomic analysis.

Authors:  Pathmanathan Cinthuja; P C I Wijesinghe; Pujitha Silva
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2022-03-29

4.  Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty?

Authors:  Akar Bedrettin; Fatih Sahin; Mucahid Osman Yucel
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.