Literature DB >> 18427406

The relative contributions of anaerobic and aerobic energy supply during track 100-, 400- and 800-m performance.

A M Nevill1, R Ramsbottom, M E Nevill, S Newport, C Williams.   

Abstract

AIM: The present study set out to identify the relative contribution of the laboratory determined physiological measures, (maximal) accumulated oxygen deficit (AOD) and maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)), when predicting track performance.
METHODS: Fourteen volunteers (men: n=10; women: n=4); mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) height 1.76+/-0.1 (men) vs 1.62+/-0.08 m (women); body mass: 67.9+/-7.1 (men) vs 50.6+/-8.2 kg (women), ran track races at distances of 100, 400 and 800 m. The individually determined (maximal) AOD and VO(2max) were measured under controlled laboratory conditions (68.3+/-10.2 vs 60.7+/-16.1; men vs women, mL x (2) x Eq x kg(-1)) and (68.7+/-7.3 vs 55.6+/-4.3; men vs women, mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)), respectively.
RESULTS: Track performance could be predicted using both laboratory measures, AOD and , with a high degree of accuracy: R2=76.9%, 84.8% and 89.1% for 100, 400 and 800 m, respectively. Data analysis confirmed the dominant energy supply during 100-m sprinting was the anaerobic energy supply processes, reflected as AOD. In contrast, oxidative metabolism (reflected as VO(2max)) was the dominant source of energy supply during 800-m performance.
CONCLUSION: The results support earlier research, rather than present textbook dogma, namely that aerobic and anaerobic processes contribute equally to maximal exercise lasting approximately 60 s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18427406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness        ISSN: 0022-4707            Impact factor:   1.637


  5 in total

Review 1.  The maximal accumulated oxygen deficit method: a valid and reliable measure of anaerobic capacity?

Authors:  Dionne A Noordhof; Jos J de Koning; Carl Foster
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The development of accumulated O2 deficit and power in young athletes.

Authors:  Raffy Dotan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Criterion-Related Validity of the Distance- and Time-Based Walk/Run Field Tests for Estimating Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Mayorga-Vega; Raúl Bocanegra-Parrilla; Martha Ornelas; Jesús Viciana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Aerobic and Anaerobic Speed Predicts 800-m Running Performance in Young Recreational Runners.

Authors:  Øyvind Støren; Jan Helgerud; Jan-Michael Johansen; Lars-Erik Gjerløw; Aanund Aamlid; Eva Maria Støa
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Effect of Computational Method on Accumulated O2 Deficit.

Authors:  Jon Ingulf Medbø; Boye Welde
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.