Literature DB >> 18426821

Impact of metformin versus repaglinide on non-glycaemic cardiovascular risk markers related to inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Søren S Lund1, Lise Tarnow, Coen D A Stehouwer, Casper G Schalkwijk, Tom Teerlink, Jørgen Gram, Kaj Winther, Merete Frandsen, Ulla M Smidt, Oluf Pedersen, Hans-Henrik Parving, Allan A Vaag.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), biomarkers reflecting inflammation and endothelial dysfunction have been linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD biomarkers) and metabolic regulation. In T2DM patients, metformin and insulin secretagogues have demonstrated equal anti-hyperglycaemic potency. Here, we report the effect of metformin versus an insulin secretagogue, repaglinide, on CVD biomarkers in non-obese T2DM patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: Single-centre, double-masked, double-dummy, crossover study during 2x4 months involving 96 non-obese (body mass index< or =27 kg/m(2)) insulin-naïve T2DM patients. At enrolment, previous oral hypoglycaemic agents were stopped and the patients entered a 1-month run-in on diet-only treatment. Hereafter, patients were randomized to either 2 mg repaglinide thrice daily followed by 1 g metformin twice daily or vice versa each during 4 months with a 1-month washout between interventions.
RESULTS: Levels of tumour necrosis factor-alpha, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen, tissue-type plasminogen activator antigen, von Willebrand factor, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and soluble E-selectin were significantly lower during metformin versus repaglinide treatments. In contrast, Amadori albumin and heart rate were higher during metformin versus repaglinide. Levels of interleukin-6, fibrinogen, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, asymmetric dimethylarginine and advanced glycation end products as well as glycaemic levels (previously reported) and 24-h blood pressure were similar between treatments. Adjustment for known macrovascular disease did not affect the between-treatment effects.
CONCLUSIONS: In non-obese T2DM patients, metformin was more effective in reducing selected biomarkers reflecting inflammation and endothelial dysfunction compared with repaglinide despite similar glycaemic levels between treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18426821     DOI: 10.1530/EJE-07-0815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  27 in total

Review 1.  Heart failure risk and major cardiovascular events in diabetes: an overview of within-group differences in non-insulin antidiabetic treatment.

Authors:  Paola Terlizzese; Fabrizio Losurdo; Massimo Iacoviello; Nadia Aspromonte
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Repaglinide: a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  The complexities of obesity and diabetes with the development and progression of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Bin Bao; Zhiwei Wang; Yiwei Li; Dejuan Kong; Shadan Ali; Sanjeev Banerjee; Aamir Ahmad; Fazlul H Sarkar
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-12-01

Review 4.  Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Shelley R Salpeter; Elizabeth Greyber; Gary A Pasternak; Edwin E Salpeter
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

Review 5.  Overview of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and mechanisms of their regulation: implications for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Bin Bao; Aamir Ahmad; Asfar S Azmi; Shadan Ali; Fazlul H Sarkar
Journal:  Curr Protoc Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06

6.  Effects of 12 weeks' treatment with a proton pump inhibitor on insulin secretion, glucose metabolism and markers of cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised double-blind prospective placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  K D Hove; C Brøns; K Færch; S S Lund; J S Petersen; A E Karlsen; P Rossing; J F Rehfeld; A Vaag
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Glycemic control prevents microvascular remodeling and increased tone in type 2 diabetes: link to endothelin-1.

Authors:  Kamakshi Sachidanandam; Jim R Hutchinson; Mostafa M Elgebaly; Erin M Mezzetti; Anne M Dorrance; Kouros Motamed; Adviye Ergul
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 8.  Effects of lifestyle measures, antiobesity agents, and bariatric surgery on serological markers of inflammation in obese patients.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tziomalos; Hariklia V Dimitroula; Niki Katsiki; Christos Savopoulos; Apostolos I Hatzitolios
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 4.711

9.  Vascularization pattern after ischemic stroke is different in control versus diabetic rats: relevance to stroke recovery.

Authors:  Roshini Prakash; Weiguo Li; Zhi Qu; Maribeth A Johnson; Susan C Fagan; Adviye Ergul
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  Cellular ADMA: regulation and action.

Authors:  Tom Teerlink; Zaiming Luo; Fredrik Palm; Christopher S Wilcox
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 7.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.