Literature DB >> 18426060

Passive tactile feedback facilitates mental rotation of handheld objects.

Mariyjane Wraga1, Monique Swaby, Catherine M Flynn.   

Abstract

Mental rotation of objects improves when passive tactile information for the rotating object accompanies the imagined rotation (Wraga, Creem, & Proffitt, 2000). We examined this phenomenon further using a within-subjects paradigm involving handheld objects. In Experiment 1, participants imagined rotating an unseen object placed on their upturned palms. The participants were faster at mental rotation when the object was rotated on their palm than when the object remained stationary. Experiment 2 tested whether the performance advantage would endure when the participants received tactile information for only the start- and endpoints of the rotation event. This manipulation did not improve performance, relative to a stationary control. Experiment 3 revealed that ambiguous tactile information, continuous with the rotation event but independent of object shape, actually degraded performance, relative to a stationary control. In Experiment 4, we found that continuous tactile rotation discrepant from imagined object movement also hindered performance, as compared with continuous tactile information aligned with imagined object movement. The findings suggest a tight coupling between tactile information specifying continuous object rotation and the corresponding internal representation of the rotating object.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18426060     DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.2.271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  23 in total

1.  Task-specific recruitment of dorsal and ventral visual areas during tactile perception.

Authors:  S C Prather; John R Votaw; K Sathian
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  The effect of apparent movement on mental rotation.

Authors:  M C Corballis; A R Blackman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-09

3.  Relative availability of surface and object properties during early haptic processing.

Authors:  S J Lederman; R L Klatzky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.

Authors:  J J Rieser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations.

Authors:  M Wraga; S H Creem; D R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  R N Shepard; J Metzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Mental rotation and the frame of reference in blind and sighted individuals.

Authors:  P A Carpenter; P Eisenberg
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-02

8.  Imagined rotations of self versus objects: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Maryjane Wraga; Jennifer M Shephard; Jessica A Church; Souheil Inati; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Mental rotation of objects versus hands: neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; G J DiGirolamo; W L Thompson; N M Alpert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Does men's advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen?

Authors:  Michèle Robert; Eliane Chevrier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.