Literature DB >> 18425980

Antioxidant supplements for prevention of mortality in healthy participants and patients with various diseases.

G Bjelakovic1, D Nikolova, L L Gluud, R G Simonetti, C Gluud.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Animal and physiological research as well as observational studies suggest that antioxidant supplements may improve survival.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of antioxidant supplements on mortality in primary or secondary prevention randomised clinical trials. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2005), EMBASE (1985 to October 2005), and the Science Citation Index Expanded (1945 to October 2005). We scanned bibliographies of relevant publications and wrote to pharmaceutical companies for additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all primary and secondary prevention randomised clinical trials on antioxidant supplements (beta-carotene, vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E, and selenium) versus placebo or no intervention. Included participants were either healthy (primary prevention trials) or had any disease (secondary prevention trials). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors extracted data. Trials with adequate randomisation, blinding, and follow-up were classified as having a low risk of bias. Random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses were performed. Random-effects meta-regression analyses were performed to assess sources of intertrial heterogeneity. MAIN
RESULTS: Sixty-seven randomised trials with 232,550 participants were included. Forty-seven trials including 180,938 participants had low risk of bias. Twenty-one trials included 164,439 healthy participants. Forty-six trials included 68111 participants with various diseases (gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, neurological, ocular, dermatological, rheumatoid, renal, endocrinological, or unspecified). Overall, the antioxidant supplements had no significant effect on mortality in a random-effects meta-analysis (relative risk [RR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99 to 1.06), but significantly increased mortality in a fixed-effect model (RR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.06). In meta-regression analysis, the risk of bias and type of antioxidant supplement were the only significant predictors of intertrial heterogeneity. In the trials with a low risk of bias, the antioxidant supplements significantly increased mortality (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.08). When the different antioxidants were assessed separately, analyses including trials with a low risk of bias and excluding selenium trials found significantly increased mortality by vitamin A (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.24), beta-carotene (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.11), and vitamin E (RR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07), but no significant detrimental effect of vitamin C (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.20). Low-bias risk trials on selenium found no significant effect on mortality (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.09). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support antioxidant supplements for primary or secondary prevention. Vitamin A, beta-carotene, and vitamin E may increase mortality. Future randomised trials could evaluate the potential effects of vitamin C and selenium for primary and secondary prevention. Such trials should be closely monitored for potential harmful effects. Antioxidant supplements need to be considered medicinal products and should undergo sufficient evaluation before marketing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18425980     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  100 in total

Review 1.  Mitochondria and antioxidant targeted therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Magali Dumont; Michael T Lin; M Flint Beal
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 2.  Glutathione redox control of asthma: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Anne M Fitzpatrick; Dean P Jones; Lou Ann S Brown
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 8.401

3.  The relation between different dimensions of alcohol consumption and burden of disease: an overview.

Authors:  Jürgen Rehm; Dolly Baliunas; Guilherme L G Borges; Kathryn Graham; Hyacinth Irving; Tara Kehoe; Charles D Parry; Jayadeep Patra; Svetlana Popova; Vladimir Poznyak; Michael Roerecke; Robin Room; Andriy V Samokhvalov; Benjamin Taylor
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Nutritive Supplements - Help or Harm for Breast Cancer Patients?

Authors:  Karsten Muenstedt; Samer El-Safadi
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  STROBE and STREGA: instruments for improving transparency and quality of reporting scientific results.

Authors:  Dag Steinar Thelle
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Has the time come to take on time itself?

Authors:  Colin Farrelly
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-07-08

Review 7.  Cardiac dysfunction and oxidative stress in the metabolic syndrome: an update on antioxidant therapies.

Authors:  Olesya Ilkun; Sihem Boudina
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.116

8.  Vitamins E and C in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in men: the Physicians' Health Study II randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Howard D Sesso; Julie E Buring; William G Christen; Tobias Kurth; Charlene Belanger; Jean MacFadyen; Vadim Bubes; JoAnn E Manson; Robert J Glynn; J Michael Gaziano
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-11-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Does antioxidant vitamin supplementation protect against muscle damage?

Authors:  Cian McGinley; Amir Shafat; Alan E Donnelly
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Snacking may improve physical function among older Americans.

Authors:  B Xu; G P Yu; C A Zizza; H Liu; L Zhao
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.