Literature DB >> 18424886

Oral capecitabine in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Stefan Boeck1, Ralf Wilkowski, Christiane J Bruns, Rolf D Issels, Christoph Schulz, Nicolas Moosmann, Dorit Laessig, Michael Haas, Alexander Golf, Volker Heinemann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To date, no standard regimen for salvage chemotherapy after gemcitabine (Gem) failure has been defined for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). Oral capecitabine (Cap) has shown promising activity in first-line chemotherapy trials in PC patients.
METHODS: Within a prospective single-center study, Cap was offered to patients who had already received at least 1 previous treatment regimen containing full-dose Gem (as a single agent, as part of a combination chemotherapy regimen or sequentially within a chemoradiotherapy protocol). Cap was administered orally at a dose of 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest. Study endpoints were objective tumor response rate by imaging criteria (according to RECIST), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) tumor marker response, time to progression, overall survival and toxicity.
RESULTS: A median of 3 treatment cycles (range 1-36) was given to 39 patients. After a median follow-up of 6.6 months, 27 patients were evaluable for response: no complete or partial responses were observed, but 15 patients (39%) had stable disease. A CA19-9 reduction of >20% after 2 cycles of Cap was documented in 6 patients (15%). Median time to progression was 2.3 months (range 0.5-45.1) and median overall survival (since start of Cap treatment) was 7.6 months (range 0.7-45.1). Predominant grade 2 and 3 toxicities (per patient analysis) were hand-foot syndrome 28% (13% grade 3); anemia 23%; leg edema 15%; diarrhea 13%; nausea/vomiting 10%, and leukocytopenia 10%.
CONCLUSION: Single-agent Cap is a safe treatment option for Gem-pretreated patients with advanced PC. Further evaluation of Cap in controlled clinical trials of Gem-pretreated patients with advanced PC is recommended. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18424886     DOI: 10.1159/000127413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  17 in total

1.  Gemcitabine plus erlotinib followed by capecitabine versus capecitabine plus erlotinib followed by gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: final results of a randomised phase 3 trial of the 'Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie' (AIO-PK0104).

Authors:  Volker Heinemann; Ursula Vehling-Kaiser; Dirk Waldschmidt; Erika Kettner; Angela Märten; Cornelia Winkelmann; Stefan Klein; Georgi Kojouharoff; Thomas C Gauler; Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal; Michael R Clemens; Michael Geissler; Tim F Greten; Susanna Hegewisch-Becker; Oleg Rubanov; Gerold Baake; Thomas Höhler; Yon D Ko; Andreas Jung; Sascha Neugebauer; Stefan Boeck
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  A novel schedule of erlotinib/capecitabine (7/7) as salvage therapy in previously treated advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a case series.

Authors:  Jiezhong Chen; Kristin Kaley; Marie Carmel Garcon; Teresa Rodriguez; Muhammad Wasif Saif
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.409

3.  Prognostic relevance of CA 19-9, CEA, CRP, and LDH kinetics in patients treated with palliative second-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Michael Haas; Rüdiger P Laubender; Petra Stieber; Stefan Holdenrieder; Christiane J Bruns; Ralf Wilkowski; Ulrich Mansmann; Volker Heinemann; Stefan Boeck
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2010-05-18

Review 4.  Beyond first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: an expanding array of therapeutic options?

Authors:  Evan J Walker; Andrew H Ko
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Amphiphilic Interpenetrating Networks for the Delivery of Hydrophobic, Low Molecular Weight Therapeutic Agents.

Authors:  Cody A Schoener; Heather N Hutson; Grace K Fletcher; Nicholas A Peppas
Journal:  Ind Eng Chem Res       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.720

Review 6.  Advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a review of current treatment strategies and developing therapies.

Authors:  Andrea Teague; Kian-Huat Lim; Andrea Wang-Gillam
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 8.168

7.  Use of gemcitabine as a second-line treatment following chemotherapy with folfirinox for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Matthieu Sarabi; Laetitia Mais; Nadia Oussaid; Françoise Desseigne; Pierre Guibert; Christelle De La Fouchardiere
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  First-in-human phase II trial of the botanical formulation PHY906 with capecitabine as second-line therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Wasif Saif; Jia Li; Lynne Lamb; Kristin Kaley; Kyle Elligers; Zaoli Jiang; Scott Bussom; Shwu-Huey Liu; Yung-Chi Cheng
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Role of taxanes in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Carmen Belli; Stefano Cereda; Michele Reni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  pH-responsive hydrogels with dispersed hydrophobic nanoparticles for the oral delivery of chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Cody A Schoener; Heather N Hutson; Nicholas A Peppas
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 4.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.