Literature DB >> 18424143

Directional prediction by the saccadic system.

Andrew J Anderson1, Hemang Yadav, R H S Carpenter.   

Abstract

One popular and fruitful approach to understanding what influences the decision of where to look next has been to present targets in a series of trials either to the right or left of a central fixation point and examine sequential effects on saccadic latency. However, there is a problem with this paradigm: Every saccade to a target is necessarily followed by an equal and opposite movement back to the center, yet the potentially confounding influence of this refixation saccade is rarely considered. Here, we introduce a novel random-walk paradigm that eliminates this difficulty. Each successive target appears to the left or right of the previous one, allowing us to study long sequences of saccades uncontaminated by refixations. This exposes a new stimulus-history effect, which is remarkably prolonged and relates primarily to movement direction: A saccade reduces the latency for subsequent movements made in the same direction and retards those in the opposite direction. Although in conventional refixation paradigms this effect cancels out, it is of particular significance in the real world--where our fixation point shifts constantly with the object of interest--and reflects a prediction of the way that real objects typically move.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18424143     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  11 in total

1.  Saccadic preparation in the frontal eye field is modulated by distinct trial history effects as revealed by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Matti S Hämäläinen; Kara A Dyckman; Jason J S Barton; Dara S Manoach
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Influence of environmental statistics on inhibition of saccadic return.

Authors:  Simon Farrell; Casimir J H Ludwig; Lucy A Ellis; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Trajectory curvature in saccade sequences: spatiotopic influences vs. residual motor activity.

Authors:  Geoffrey Megardon; Casimir Ludwig; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Target direction rather than position determines oculomotor expectation in repeating sequences.

Authors:  Andrew J Anderson; Matthew J Stainer; Peter Brotchie; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The influence of motor training on human express saccade production.

Authors:  Raquel Bibi; Jay A Edelman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Economic value biases uncertain perceptual choices in the parietal and prefrontal cortices.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Etienne Koechlin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Context-gated statistical learning and its role in visual-saccadic decisions.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; Simon Farrell; Lucy A Ellis; Tom E Hardwicke; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-08-15

8.  Directional interactions between current and prior saccades.

Authors:  Stephanie A H Jones; Christopher D Cowper-Smith; David A Westwood
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The mechanism underlying inhibition of saccadic return.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; Simon Farrell; Lucy A Ellis; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Saccadic momentum and facilitation of return saccades contribute to an optimal foraging strategy.

Authors:  Niklas Wilming; Simon Harst; Nico Schmidt; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.