Literature DB >> 18424142

The direct assessment of genetic heterozygosity through scent in the mouse.

Michael D Thom1, Paula Stockley, Francine Jury, William E R Ollier, Robert J Beynon, Jane L Hurst.   

Abstract

The role of individual genetic heterozygosity in mate choice is the subject of much current debate. Several recent studies have reported female preference for more heterozygous males, but the mechanisms underlying heterozygote preference remain largely unknown. Females could favor males that are more successful in intrasexual competition, but they could also assess male heterozygosity directly at specific polymorphic genetic markers. Here, we use a breeding program to remove the intrinsic correlation between genome-wide heterozygosity and two highly polymorphic gene clusters that could allow direct assessment of heterozygosity through scent in mice: the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and the major urinary proteins (MUPs). When other sources of variation are controlled and intrasexual competition is minimized, female mice prefer to associate with MUP heterozygous over MUP homozygous males. MHC heterozygosity does not influence preference, and neither does heterozygosity across the rest of the genome when intrasexual competition between males is restricted. Female mice thus assess male heterozygosity directly through multiple MUP isoforms expressed in scent signals, independently of the effects of genome-wide heterozygosity on male competitiveness. This is the first evidence that animals may use signals of genetic heterozygosity that have no direct association with individual vigour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18424142     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  28 in total

1.  High resolution X-ray structures of mouse major urinary protein nasal isoform in complex with pheromones.

Authors:  Samantha Perez-Miller; Qin Zou; Milos V Novotny; Thomas D Hurley
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  The joy of sex pheromones.

Authors:  Carolina Gomez-Diaz; Richard Benton
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 3.  In search of the chemical basis for MHC odourtypes.

Authors:  Jae Kwak; Alan Willse; George Preti; Kunio Yamazaki; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Semiochemical compounds of preen secretion reflect genetic make-up in a seabird species.

Authors:  Sarah Leclaire; Thomas Merkling; Christine Raynaud; Hervé Mulard; Jean-Marie Bessière; Emeline Lhuillier; Scott A Hatch; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The scent of inbreeding: a male sex pheromone betrays inbred males.

Authors:  Erik van Bergen; Paul M Brakefield; Stéphanie Heuskin; Bas J Zwaan; Caroline M Nieberding
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Chemosignals, hormones and mammalian reproduction.

Authors:  Aras Petrulis
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 7.  Major urinary protein regulation of chemical communication and nutrient metabolism.

Authors:  Yingjiang Zhou; Liangyou Rui
Journal:  Vitam Horm       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.421

8.  Darcin: a male pheromone that stimulates female memory and sexual attraction to an individual male's odour.

Authors:  Sarah A Roberts; Deborah M Simpson; Stuart D Armstrong; Amanda J Davidson; Duncan H Robertson; Lynn McLean; Robert J Beynon; Jane L Hurst
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 7.431

9.  Encoding choosiness: female attraction requires prior physical contact with individual male scents in mice.

Authors:  Steven A Ramm; Sarah A Cheetham; Jane L Hurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Relatedness communicated in lemur scent.

Authors:  Toni Lyn Morelli; R Andrew Hayes; Helen F Nahrung; Thomas E Goodwin; Innocent H Harelimana; Laura J Macdonald; Patricia C Wright
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.