Literature DB >> 18423807

Reduction in beta2-microglobulin with super-flux versus high-flux dialysis membranes: results of a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.

Rebecca Pellicano1, Kevan R Polkinghorne, Peter G Kerr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uremic toxicity is a major concern in the dialysis population. There is keen interest in techniques that increase the removal of larger uremic molecules. We examined the short-term impact of a new, more porous, super-flux Helixone membrane (FX-E) versus the conventional high-flux Helixone membrane (FX-60) on beta(2)-microglobulin (beta2M) reduction and nutritional and inflammatory parameters. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized, double blind, crossover, pilot trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A single freestanding dialysis center. 30 stable hemodialysis patients. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated with FX-60 and FX-E membranes for a treatment period of 6 weeks each, with a 2-week washout period in between. OUTCOME & MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was change in beta2M concentrations from baseline to end of treatment. Serum samples were obtained predialysis and postdialysis at 0, 2, and 6 weeks, and dialysate albumin samples were collected continuously throughout dialysis sessions.
RESULTS: Mean postdialysis beta2M concentrations at the end of 6 weeks of treatment were 6.73 mg/L for FX-E versus 8.22 mg/L for FX-60, which was significantly lower overall by 0.69 mg/L (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.09 to -0.29; P = 0.001). beta2M reduction ratios were greater overall with FX-E by 4.83% (95% CI, 2.78 to 6.89; P < 0.001), with mean values of 57% for FX-60 versus 66% for FX-E at the end of treatment. Median dialysate albumin loss with FX-E was 1.23 g (range, 0.22 to 4.83 g) compared with 0.17 g (range, 0.0017 to 2.69 g) with FX-60, which was greater by 1.52 g (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.93; P < 0.001). Serum albumin concentrations were slightly lower with FX-E by 0.1 g/dL (0.55 g/L; 95% CI, -1.04 to -0.07; P = 0.03), but prealbumin concentrations were not significantly different at 8.53 mg/L (95% CI, -23.76 to 6.71; P = 0.3). There were no differences in inflammatory cytokine concentrations or small-solute removal. LIMITATIONS: Short-term pilot study.
CONCLUSION: In this stable dialysis population, removal of beta2M was more efficient with the Helixone super-flux FX-E membrane, with only a small decrease in albumin concentrations despite increased albumin loss. Large trials with longer treatment periods are required to evaluate the impact of the FX-E membrane on clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18423807     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.02.296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  5 in total

Review 1.  High-flux versus low-flux membranes for end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Suetonia C Palmer; Kannaiyan S Rabindranath; Jonathan C Craig; Paul J Roderick; Francesco Locatelli; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

Review 2.  The membrane perspective of uraemic toxins: which ones should, or can, be removed?

Authors:  Sudhir K Bowry; Peter Kotanko; Rainer Himmele; Xia Tao; Michael Anger
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-12-27

3.  Dialyzer Reuse and Outcomes of High Flux Dialysis.

Authors:  Christos Argyropoulos; Maria-Eleni Roumelioti; Abdus Sattar; John A Kellum; Lisa Weissfeld; Mark L Unruh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Middle molecule clearance with high cut-off dialyzer versus high-flux dialyzer using continuous veno-venous hemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lorenz Weidhase; Elena Haussig; Stephan Haussig; Thorsten Kaiser; Jonathan de Fallois; Sirak Petros
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Myoglobin clearance with continuous veno-venous hemodialysis using high cutoff dialyzer versus continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration using high-flux dialyzer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lorenz Weidhase; Jonathan de Fallois; Elena Haußig; Thorsten Kaiser; Meinhard Mende; Sirak Petros
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.